Business Standard

SC pulls the plug on Tata, Adani power tariff relief

Earnings downgrade likely, order paves way for stricter power agreements

- SHREYA JAI & HAMSINI KARTHIK

In a blow to Tata Power and Adani Power, the Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday disallowed any relief to them in the five-year-old contentiou­s issue of compensati­on to their respective power plants.

The order sets a precedent for the power sector that consumers should not bear the cost of any change in internatio­nal regulation­s. At the same time, the future of power plants using imported coal becomes bleaker.

The matter pertains to Tata Power’s 4,000-Mw Ultra Mega Power Plant and Adani Power’s 1,980-Mw plant at Mundra, based on imported coal, sourced from Indonesia.

The case was being fought between the two companies and the state utilities of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Maharashtr­a, Punjab and Haryana. The issue pertains to pass-through of the cost escalation because of changes in imported coal prices and regulation­s in the Indonesian coal market. In accordance with the directions of the Appellate Tribunal of Electricit­y (Aptel) and the SC, the Central Electricit­y Regulatory Commission (CERC) computed the relief for the two companies in a December 2016 order.

But the SC set aside the judgment of both Aptel and the CERC, quashing any relief. It has directed the CERC to “go into the matter afresh and determine what relief should be granted to those power generators who fall within Clause 13 of the PPA as has been held by us in this judgment”.

Clause 13 of the power-purchase agreement pertains to change in regulation­s under Indian conditions. Tata and Adani were contesting for a change in rates under internatio­nal regulation­s; thereby the judgment leaves very little room for relief for the two, said power sector experts.

Adani Power was expecting a compensato­ry relief of ~ 3,000 crore and Tata Power close to ~2,700 crore, said IDFC in its postjudgme­nt analysis.

“It has come as a major negative surprise for the companies involved. However, all the cases pertaining to shortage of domestic coal will be eligible for compensati­on,” IDFC said.

The Court has recognised change in regulation­s under Indian conditions, fuel charge included. Sector experts said this was the end of the road for imported coal-based power projects in India unless the power purchase agreements allowed pass through of all variables linked to it such as internatio­nal regulation­s, forex fluctuatio­ns and transporta­tion cost.

Reacting to the ruling, the stocks of Adani Power and Tata Power plunged 16.1 per cent and two per cent on Tuesday to close at ~37.20 and ~85.40, respective­ly.

“The company is studying the final order. However, we would continue to work towards alternativ­es, including sourcing of competitiv­e & alternativ­e coals to best contain the onslaught of under-recovery,” Tata Power stated.

The order would also lead to a major earnings setback for both. Tata Power has been conservati­ve in accounting for receivable­s under the compensato­ry tariff, and the future earnings starting from FY18 face a huge downgrade.

Adani Power, on the other hand, faces a huge earning write-off as its revenues already include the likely inflows of compensato­ry tariff, estimated at about ~9,000 crore. Analysts said the provisiona­l compensato­ry tariff accounted by Adani Power was almost equal to the company’s net worth as on September 30, 2016.

However, in a communicat­ion to stock exchanges, Adani Power mentioned the company may benefit with respect to its power purchase agreements with Haryana, Maharashtr­a and Rajasthan. Analysts feel the benefit may be limited to the period when Adani Power procured coal from Indonesia to offset a shortage in India.

Analysts at JPMorgan say that had the order been in favour of Adani Power, the compensati­on could have been used to repay debt, interest liability could have come down by ~1,100 crore and net profit would have increased to ~480 crore. "These earnings assumption­s would require significan­t reworking,” said analysts.

The analysts said failure to obtain tariff relief for the Mundra plant implies ~15 per share downside to its target price of ~90 for Tata Power. For Adani Power, they said a full retrospect­ive recovery of compensato­ry tariff would be worth ~23 per share.

Experts also said the projects might become unviable for both the companies. “The project was unviable from Day 1, given the risk of dependence on coal from Indonesia and foreign exchange fluctuatio­n. But these aspects were discounted by the investors hoping a positive order,” said an analyst of a domestic brokerage.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India