Business Standard

Pledged assets can be auctioned by insolvency profession­als: NCLT

- DEV CHATTERJEE Mumbai, 19 July

A recent National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) order has sent corporate lawyers and promoters into a tizzy. The NCLT’s Mumbai Bench has asked for the personal properties of promoters to be auctioned off even when the process of insolvency is pending before the insolvency profession­al.

The petition was filed by Schweitzer Systemtek India, invoking the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) with the NCLT, after it defaulted on a loan of ~4.5 crore given by Dhanlaxmi Bank. The suit was initiated by the promoter himself against the asset reconstruc­tion company (ARC) after Dhanlaxmi Bank sold the loan to Phoenix ARC. The NCLT Mumbai Bench said the promoters cannot be granted any relaxation under the IBC and appointed an insolvency profession­al to go ahead with the auction of the property.

“This Code of 2016 has prescribed certain limitation­s, which are in-built and must not be overlooked. The ‘moratorium’ indeed is an effective tool, sometimes being used by the corporate debtor to thwart or frustrate the recovery proceeding­s, as is the case here,” said the order of July 3.

“Going by the strict interpreta­tion of the relevant provisions, no fault can be found with the order of the NCLT, but the material question that remains lingering is whether the prayer could have been granted in the interest of justice and equity,” said R S Loona, managing partner, Dhaval Vussonji Alliance.

If any viable restructur­ing is worked out, the creditor will recover his dues without enforcemen­t of any security. Else, the creditor will be entitled to stand outside liquidatio­n proceeding­s and realise his dues by enforcemen­t of all security, including collateral ones.

Another lawyer said the onus is now on the company to approach the NCLT tribunal and get a stay against this order. “This case will have farreachin­g impact on other similar cases being taken up by the NCLT Bench, which is set to hear 500 non-performing asset cases in the years to come,” said a lawyer.

According to the IBC, a company gets 270 days to resolve the debt in which an insolvency profession­al is appointed by the NCLT and the present board of directors is suspended. After 270 days, if the debt is not resolved, the profession­al can sell the company’s assets to recover the loan. But according to the NCLT’s order in Schweitzer Systemtek India suit, instead of waiting for the six-month waiting period, the insolvency profession­al can now go ahead and sell the promoter’s personal property, which was pledged with the banks.

The NCLT Bench, in its examinatio­n of the balance sheet of the company, found its assets were significan­tly insufficie­nt even as the liability was approximat­ely ~5.3 crore. “The possibilit­y of recovery from a sundry debtor are substantia­l in nature, which requires due considerat­ion,” the court observed.

Going by this definition, many promoters, who are facing proceeding­s in the NCLT Bench, are staring at property losses even before the stipulated period.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India