Business Standard

Privacy protection losing battle in modern era: SC

- PRESS TRUST OF INDIA

Voicing concern over possible misuse of personal informatio­n in public domain, the Supreme Court today said that protection of the concept of privacy in the technologi­cal era was a "losing battle".

Anine-judgeConst­itutionben­ch, headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar, heard marathon arguments for six days over a period of three weeks and reserved its verdict on the issue whether right to privacy can be held as a fundamenta­l right under the Constituti­on.

A battery of senior lawyers, including Attorney General K K Venugopal, Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, Arvind Datar, Kapil Sibal, Gopal Subaramani­am, Shayam Divan, Anand Grover, C A Sundaram and Rakesh Dwivedi, advanced arguments in favour and against the inclusion of right to privacy as a fundamenta­l right.

The judgement would be delivered on or before August 27 as Chief Justice Khehar, who presided over the bench, would demit the office on that day. The bench, which favoured "overarchin­g" guidelines to protect private informatio­n in public domain, said there was a need to "maintain the core of privacy" as the notion of privacy was fast becoming irrelevant in an all-pervading technologi­cal era.

"We are fighting a losing battle of privacy. We do not know for what purpose the informatio­n will be used. This is exactly a cause of concern,” the Bench, which also comprised justices J Chelameswa­r, S A Bobde, R K Agrawal, R F Nariman, AMSapre, D Y Chandrachu­d, S K Kaul and S Abdul Nazeer, said.

Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, who appeared for the Gujarat government, however, said transparen­cy was a key component in the modern age and providing basic personal informatio­n could not be covered under right to privacy and referred to illustrati­ons in support of his submission.

He said that commercial misuse or violation of personal informatio­n can be taken care of by the Telecom Rregulator­y Authority of India (TRAI) and other agencies.

The senior lawyer then referred to the Supreme Court Rules which made it mandatory for lawyers and litigants to part with various personal informatio­n like names, address, telephone number, occupation and national unique ID cards, if any, for filing a public interest litigation.

"Your lordships are marching forward with technology by seeking various personal informatio­n under the rules," Dwivedi said, adding the Aadhaar card as an identity document was also accepted.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India