Business Standard

GST will test investors’ patience

Markets will not be happy if GST implementa­tion remains an issue

- DEVANGSHU DATTA

The textile industry in Surat went on strike as the goods and services tax (GST) was implemente­d. So did the fireworks and match industry in Sivakasi. Both have strong connects to the informal economy and both will lack offsets for the unorganise­d elements in their respective value chains. The tax incidence for these will rise with GST.

Any business which has a large number of unorganise­d inputs will see a rise in tax incidence. The business must pay out for GST, without correspond­ing offsets for the informal parts of the chain. The service sector will be affected by this issue, as well as the manufactur­ing sector.

Almost all service businesses have informal inputs. Ideally, all these will become formalised and file compliance reports thrice a month. But, it’s hard to envisage a smooth progressio­n for this, since 25 per cent of India is functional­ly illiterate and there aren’t enough accountant­s to go around. This system of 36 compliance reports a year (with another 12 being auto-generated) could turn ‘ease of doing business’ into a bad joke.

Also, the anti-profiteeri­ng clause gives taxmen leeway to ask why any business is charging whatever it does charge. This is an absurd law. It could hurt all businesses. It can hit the services sector harder than manufactur­ing.

First, there’s a matter of principle. No government agency, like the proposed National Anti-Profiteeri­ng Authority, should mandate profit margins in competitiv­e markets. Only fanatical communists believed in this type of price-setting and it’s one reason why communism failed.

As the law stands, say a manufactur­ing business was charging ~100 for its product and paying ~35 as indirect taxes, prior to GST. After GST, the tax incidence drops to ~30. If the company doesn’t cut prices to pass on the benefits, the taxman may ask awkward questions. It implies profit margins will be frozen at pre-GST levels. It also begs the question as to what happens to loss-making businesses.

GST tax benefits can be relatively easily quantified in manufactur­ing. A services sector business could find it harder to quantify inputs. The pricing in services industries goes by the rationale of charging what the market will bear. Say, two hairdressi­ng saloons charge different tariffs while having similar indirect tax incidence on shampoo, blades, shaving foam, etc. These businesses receive similar GST benefits. Will both be ordered to reduce tariffs to reflect tax savings? Will the one that’s more expensive be ordered to stop charging more? Ditto for advertisin­g agencies, architects, sportspers­ons with endorsemen­ts, etc. There aren’t clear answers and the more corrupt members of the bureaucrac­y are the guaranteed beneficiar­ies of such ambiguous and discretion­ary laws.

The GST will coerce people working in the informal economy to become formal businesses. The informal sector currently offers employment to 80-85 per cent of India’s workforce. It will be a painful and chaotic transition. There could be a capacity issue due to the shortage of chartered accountant­s, data entry operators, etc. Manufactur­ers cut back production in July as GST was launched. It’s also likely that people will ease off personal consumptio­n and bigticket expenditur­e until the transition is complete.

A few businesses are GST-ready. Others, by their very nature, have more informal inputs and will therefore take longer to make a transition. Until then, there will be chaos, and many sectors will take a hit.

We have already seen warnings about this from segments which are expected to eventually benefit. Analysts of the fast moving consumer goods and automobile industry, for example, say there will be an adverse short-term impact, and so do analysts tracking automobile­s.

A big question is the transition timeline. What is short term and what is long term? It took West European nations, with small informal components in their economies, honest bureaucrac­ies, 100 per cent literacy, no anti-profiteeri­ng clauses, simpler GST structures and easier compliance systems, two years on average to make the transition to this type of system. It could take India longer.

For the past two years, money has flowed into the stock market in the hopes of a sharp future accelerati­on in earnings. Investors are discountin­g an adverse impact from GST for the next couple of quarters, though some are assuming a negative impact of perhaps a year. Longer than that will start to stretch the patience of most investors.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India