Business Standard

Sebi to conduct fresh probe into Infy-Panaya deal

In June, the regulator gave a clean chit to the IT major after a preliminar­y inquiry

- SHRIMI CHOUDHARY

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) will conduct a fresh probe into corporate governance complaints against Infosys in connection with the Panaya acquisitio­n. Sources said the role of several board members of the informatio­n technology giant could also come under the market regulator’s scanner.

In June, Sebi had conducted a preliminar­y probe into the allegation­s levelled by an anonymous whistle-blower on the acquisitio­n of the Israel-based Panaya, which Infosys bought in February 2015 for $200 million. However, the regulator had closed the probe saying there was no merit in the charges made. The change in Sebi’s stance could be due to the recommenda­tions received from the government, sources familiar with the developmen­ts said.

The decision to re-examine the matter comes against the backdrop of an ongoing spat between the company’s promoters led by N R Narayana Murthy and the board at the IT major. Vishal Sikka resigned as the company’s MD and CEO on August 18, citing constant interferen­ce from its founders. The board backed Sikka and said the co-founder had put the CEO under “continuous assault” and made “inappropri­ate demands”.

Top regulatory sources said Sebi had received several representa­tions regarding the ongoing crisis, including about allegation­s and counterall­egations from various sides, according to news agency PTI.

Murthy had raised corporate governance issues at the company, specifical­ly with regard to the Panaya acquisitio­n, following the whistleblo­wer’s complaint that procedures were not followed during the acquisitio­n. Following this, Infosys appointed an internatio­nal law firm to conduct a forensic investigat­ion, which gave a clean chit to the company. Murthy asked for the report to be made public, which the Infosys management refused. Murthy also wanted explanatio­ns for the then CFO Rajiv Bansal’s objection to the deal and his subsequent exit.

Earlier this year, an Infosys whistle-blower had written to Sebi, alleging corporate governance lapses by Sikka and other board members.

The whistle-blower, in a letter to Sebi and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), had alleged that Infosys had overpaid for the acquisitio­n of Panaya.

The letter also raised the issue of the severance pay-out to Rajiv Bansal.

The regulator in the initial findings concluded that requisite procedures and disclosure­s were in place for both the acquisitio­n and Bansal’s severance pay. Hence, the probe did not find any corporate governance violations by the Infosys management.

The whistle-blower’s letter had stated that Panaya was struggling to raise money and employees were leaving the company when the acquisitio­n took place, and the Infosys board overlooked the decision to buy the firm at a premium.

It alleged that Bansal received 30 months’ salary, which was not as per his contract, which allowed only a three-month severance. The whistle-blower alleged Bansal’s contract was changed purposely to keep the deal a secret.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India