Business Standard

Trump rolls back birth control mandate

- ROBERT PEAR, REBECCA R RUIZ & LAURIE GOODSTEIN

The Trump administra­tion on Friday moved to expand the rights of employers to deny women insurance coverage for contracept­ion and issued sweeping guidance on religious freedom that critics said could also erode civil rights protection­s for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgende­r people.

The twin actions, by the Department of Health and Human Services and the Justice Department, were meant to carry out a promise issued by President Trump five months ago, when he declared in the Rose Garden that “we will not allow people of faith to be targeted, bullied or silenced anymore.”

Attorney General Jeff Sessions quoted those words in issuing guidance to federal agencies and prosecutor­s, instructin­g them to take the position in court that workers, employers and organisati­ons may claim broad exemptions from nondiscrim­ination laws on the basis of religious objections.

At the same time, the Department of Health and Human Services issued two rules rolling back a federal requiremen­t that employers must include birth control coverage in their health insurance plans. The rules offer an exemption to any employer that objects to covering contracept­ion services on the basis of sincerely held religious beliefs or moral conviction­s.

More than 55 million women have access to birth control without co-payments because of the contracept­ive coverage mandate, according to a study commission­ed by the Obama administra­tion. Under the new regulation­s, hundreds of thousands of women could lose those benefits.

The contracept­ive coverage mandate, issued by the Obama administra­tion under the Affordable Care Act, removed cost as a barrier to birth control, a longtime goal of advocates for women’s rights. But the mandate ensnarled the federal government in more than five years of litigation, which overshadow­ed many other aspects of the health care law.

The rules issued on Friday prompted more lawsuits and threats of lawsuits. The attorney general of Massachuse­tts, Maura Healey, and the attorney general of California, Xavier Becerra, filed lawsuits to block the new rules, which took effect immediatel­y.

Both said the rules violated the First Amendment, which bars government action “respecting an establishm­ent of religion.”

But some conservati­ves and religious groups said the new rules would allow them to live out their religious beliefs. Speaker Paul D Ryan of Wisconsin hailed the rules as “a landmark day for religious liberty.” The rules were also welcomed by groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor, an order of Roman Catholic nuns who had resisted the Obama administra­tion’s mandate because, they said, it would make them “morally complicit in grave sin.”

“The new administra­tion isn’t going to force Catholic nuns to provide contracept­ives,” said Mark Rienzi, senior counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, who represents the Little Sisters of the Poor. “We’ve been on a long, divisive culture war because the last administra­tion decided nuns needed to give out contracept­ives.”

The new initiative­s came a day after Sessions changed the Justice Department’s position on a related issue: whether a ban on workplace discrimina­tion on the basis of “sex” in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 encompasse­s discrimina­tion on the basis of gender identity. The Obama administra­tion had adopted the view that it does cover transgende­r people, but Sessions said the department should take the position in court that it does not.

The contracept­ive coverage mandate, issued by the Obama administra­tion, removed cost as a barrier to birth control

 ?? REUTERS ?? There have been several protests against the potential move to deny women insurance coverage for birth control
REUTERS There have been several protests against the potential move to deny women insurance coverage for birth control

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India