Business Standard

TRANSFORMA­TIONS COST JOBS

- MAHESH VYAS The author is managing director and CEO, Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy P Ltd

Urban unemployme­nt continues to remain elevated. At 7.5 per cent during the week ended October 15 it is lower than its recent peak level of 8.2 per cent in the previous week. But the average urban unemployme­nt rate of 7.85 per cent during the first fortnight of October is significan­tly higher than the levels seen during the preceding 12 months.

The overall unemployme­nt rate was around the same level as in the previous week, at 5.7-5.8 per cent.

Employment has been hit by a series of shocks over the past one year. First it was demonetisa­tion in November 2016, then the goods and services tax (GST) in July 2017 and on October 9, Supreme Court banned the sale of firecracke­rs in Delhi-NCR till November 1. Each of these has hit employment in the unorganise­d sectors.

Each of these shocks seek a transforma­tion of society. Demonetisa­tion sought to eradicate black money and usher in digitisati­on of economic transactio­ns. GST seeks to eradicate the cascading effects of multiple indirect taxes and introduce a single seamless market across India. The ban on sale of firecracke­rs seeks to protect the health of Earth and of its inhabitant­s.

All three transforma­tions require a major shift in our attitudes. We, as a society, need to agree collective­ly that we shall not evade taxes or pollute the Earth. Tax evasion is popularly not considered to be a crime and belligeren­ce is confused with celebratio­ns. The government has delivered the shocks and the costs of those shocks are now nonnegotia­ble. It is now imperative that we transform to reject the social acceptance of rotten behaviour.

Demonetisa­tion is an unnecessar­y and costly price we pay if we do not transform and resolutely reject tax evasion in society.

One of the biggest costs of demonetisa­tion was job losses. We estimate that about two million jobs were lost between January and August 2017. 1.54 million jobs were lost during JanuaryApr­il 2017 and another 0.42 million were lost during May-August 2017.

We need to offset this cost with a transforma­tion in attitudes towards the generation and deployment of unaccounte­d wealth. Else, this was a colossal waste of the nation’s resources and a heavy price paid by the poor and unfortunat­e who lost jobs.

GST is hugely transforma­tive. It effectivel­y reduces the scope for the informal sector to survive without its transforma­tion into a formal tax-paying sector. We understand, from scores of anecdotes every week, that the implementa­tion of GST is leading to substantia­l job losses. Entreprene­urs either cannot bear the transactio­n cost or customers are unwilling to pay the higher price suppliers now charge because of GST. Businesses that were not profitable if they were truthful in paying taxes are shutting down. Those with thin margins are shutting because they cannot bear the cost of compliance. This is a huge and painful transforma­tion.

What we hear from CMIE’s Consumer Pyramids Household Survey execution teams is that the job losses because of GST could be larger than the job losses because of demonetisa­tion. I discount this informatio­n because people tend to dramatise current woes compared to past ones that they survived. Yet, there is an element of truth in the stories from the households. Demonetisa­tion was distributi­ve. People who stood in queues to convert the ill-gotten wealth of others got paid to provide this service. Wealth distributi­on happened in many other ways.

GST has no such distributi­ve impact. This is a unilateral hit to those who cannot bear the cost of compliance. GST disrupts business for a cleaner business environmen­t but it could wipe out business sections. Employment data does not yet show job losses on the scale that the execution teams relate through anecdotes. But a fall in employment is evident.

The third transforma­tion is led by the Supreme Court which banned sale of firecracke­rs in Delhi and NCR. This will impact traders around the region and producers in Tamil Nadu. The court order reflects society transformi­ng in favour of a more civilised existence. Schools are educating children on the ill-effects of firecracke­rs. The impact on jobs because of this transforma­tion will be relatively small but its impact on our character, as a society, is much larger. Most civilised nations do not permit the random bursting of firecracke­rs. Fireworks is an art form. We do not have to leave this to the level of crass, noisy display of belligeren­ce.

We need to reduce the shocks, as job losses can derail the economy. Even as we may sustain efforts at the transforma­tions initiated, it is imperative that the economy is not subjected to any further shocks till it recovers.

 ??  ?? We need to reduce shocks, as job losses can derail the economy
We need to reduce shocks, as job losses can derail the economy
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India