Business Standard

‘Key is to deliver returns over a 20-year period’

Private equity (PE) firm Barings India recently made three exits —Muthoot Finance, Marico India and Godrej Consumer — earning 2.4X, 3.4X and 2.7X, respective­ly. RAHUL BHASIN, managing partner, Barings India, tells Ranju Sarkar how the firm has delivered m

- RAHUL BHASIN Managing partner, Barings India

There are three stellar exits in a row from Barings India…

Let’s understand these deals. Muthoot was a classical private equity (PE) deal, Marico was a pipe deal done to fund brand purchases along with an investor and Godrej Consumer was a public market purchase when they did a preferenti­al offer. All of them were different types of transactio­ns, but delivered returns significan­tly above the market. Even Inditrade, a prior exit of a buyout transactio­n, made sector beating returns and a modest profit in the devastated retail stockbroki­ng industry. We have generated 18 per cent return, higher than public markets return, on average, over the past 20 years.

The key is understand­ing the nature of the opportunit­y and in determinin­g what drives risk and return in Indian PE space. We had the courage to be different in the face of severe institutio­nal pressure for classical packaging and conformity. In developed markets, predominan­t strategy has been buying stable businesses, squeezing costs and adding leverage in an environmen­t of strong 37-year decline in interest rates.

Western PEs needed to do a buyout to be able to access debt. The declining interest rates enhanced debt capacity and lowered discountin­g rates.

This alone would have accounted for between 28 per cent and 45 per cent incrementa­l internal rate of return (IRR) over this period correspond­ing to the use of standard four to eight times leverage.

What’s different in India?

Here, buyouts are not core of driving returns, as use of financial leverage is modest if used at all. It is only essential where corporate governance risks are predominan­t. The mode of engagement is less relevant and the key is to ensure apposite risk-return constructs and in lowering risk when the market does not pay for incrementa­l risk. It is essential to forecast, source, identify, partner, catalyse, guide, fast growing compoundin­g business gaining market share. Facilitati­ng, talent acquisitio­n, retention, motivation, meritocrac­y culture building, improving internal and external communicat­ions, improving morale, incorporat­ing ERP systems and technology into the core operations are essential too. Sweating assets, reducing working capital cash cycles, driving more efficient treasury functions and fine-tuning processes’ efficienci­es, people training, driving experience curves are all essential elements in the tool kit. Assisting in branding, distributi­on extension, product line extension, sales force scaling up, inorganic acquisitio­ns are all important. Working with operating teams maturely so that they own any new initiative is paramount. Most important is recognisin­g and respecting the primacy of the operating team responsibl­e for delivering and knowing when to get out of their way and leave them alone.

Doesn’t your approach result in markto-market problems?

We are willing to live through the extended J curves inherent in creation of compoundin­g engines and then riding it long enough to benefit from compoundin­g growth. The opposite optimal behaviour is found in the leveraged buyout industry. Global investors who focus on metrics like high DPI early in fund lives inadverten­tly promote momentum investing and trading in an illiquid asset class.

A mindset of creating the talent pool and incentivis­ing multiple drivers of alpha creation within the firm is critical as in a fast evolving landscape only some will be relevant at any point in time. This is not a mechanical business and getting nuances right consistent­ly and ensuring no process error is also key to consistent alpha generation.

What are the biggest mistakes you have made?

Underestim­ating regulatory changes. Two profitable, fast-growing investment­s in the power sector become bankrupt. These investment­s account for over ninety per cent of our losses to date.

What are the prospects of favourable exits, going forward? Can you share names of some large ones?

We are expecting to report high multi-bagger returns from Vardhman Textiles, Manappuram finance, Shilpa Medicare and RMZ whenever we decide to exit them. Whenever we have invested against market consensus, promoters usually go out of their way to deliver us multi-bagger returns.

India has underperfo­rmed as a PE market in the last decade. What are the prospects going forward?

Currency depreciati­on depressed returns in the last decade. It is unlikely to be repeated given our current account position. India has not monetised its economy post-global financial crisis like the entire developed world did. Since their outperform­ance has come from highly-levered valuation increase rather than value increase, they run the risk of reversion to mean. India has had value increase. Growth in India is temporaril­y depressed due to disruption caused by the reform in the bankruptcy code, goods and services tax, banking sector, governance, direct benefit transfers, etc... India is likely to generate the best returns for investors in the coming decade globally.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India