Business Standard

Sebi’s diktat spooks overseas investors

- PAVAN BURUGULA & SAMIE MODAK Mumbai, 30 October

It is not just domestic investors but also foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) who are grappling with the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (Sebi’s) diktat mandating linking Aadhaar with “all demat accounts”.

In August, Sebi had directed the stock exchanges to cease the accounts of all the clients who failed to submit Aadhaar details by December 31.

Prima facie, the circular appeared to be aimed at domestic investors. However, ambiguous wording has spooked FPIs, who have sought clarity from Sebi on whether the circular would be applicable to them too.

“FPIs, through their custodians, have written to Sebi, seeking clarity on the Aadhaar issue. The instructio­ns issued by Sebi in this regard are not clear. We want the regulator to provide explicit exemptions so that there are no last-minute surprises,” said a source who has a direct knowledge of the developmen­t.

Aadhaar is a unique-identity number issued to all Indian residents based on their biometric and demographi­c data. While Aadhaar can’t be issued to institutio­ns, the unique-identity numbers of the “authorised signatory” who operate the accounts need to be quoted.

Sources said Sebi was gathering market feedback on the issue and could provide the custodians more clarificat­ion. Meanwhile, Sebi is keeping a tab on the developmen­ts in the Supreme Court, where the constituti­onal validity of Aadhaar is being challenged, the source added.

Citibank, JP Morgan, HSBC, and BNP Paribas are the top custodians who handle FPI accounts. Some of them have written to Sebi on the matter.

“Although FPIs have not been given any specific exemptions, I think there is no need to panic as there are enough legal safeguards available. However, a clarificat­ion from Sebi in this context would be welcome because it would address the concerns of the foreign funds,” said Rajesh Gandhi, partner, Deloitte Haskins & Sells. The biggest fear of FPIs is that lack of clarity could leave room for adverse interpreta­tions as previously seen in issues like the minimum alternate tax (MAT) and General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR). In the event of Sebi not providing timely clarity, overseas funds would stare at physical hurdles linking Aadhaar. Typically, some FPIs operate their trading accounts directly while some authorise a local depository participan­t (DP) to manage their funds. In the first scenario, authorised signatorie­s are based out of an off-shore location such as Singapore or Hong Kong. According to the Aadhaar Act, 2016, only Indian residents are authorised to get an Aadhaar number. In the case of accounts managed by DPs, FPIs are concerned about informatio­n privacy, said a source. “Sebi should make some specific exceptions keeping in mind various practical hurdles. Unlike the western markets, where brokers hold the securities on behalf of owners, in India the shares reside with the actual owner. In the case of FPIs, Sebi has also amended several regulation­s and now has access to details of end beneficiar­ies. Hence, the amount of value add derived by linking Aadhaar with demat accounts is limited,” said Sandeep Parekh, founder, Finsec Advisors. In recent years, Sebi has increased the know your customer (KYC) requiremen­ts for overseas investors to prevent money laundering. Experts say further tightening may not be required. “Sebi already has access to informatio­n of all foreign portfolio investor transactio­ns through the stock exchanges and custodians. Further, there is a strong KYC documentat­ion in place and their demat accounts are already linked with the PAN number. I think the current system is transparen­t enough and asking them for Aadhaar could be an undue burden on them,” said Sudhir Bassi, partner, Khaitan & Co.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India