Business Standard

Easier anti-profiteeri­ng complaint form soon

Standing committee asked to suggest a simplified version of the form

- DILASHA SETH

Filing complaints against companies for not passing the benefits of tax reduction under the goods and services tax (GST) regime is expected to become simpler.

The government is looking at simplifyin­g the anti-profiteeri­ng applicatio­n complaint form to allow the public to file profiteeri­ng complaints against firms. The chairman of the antiprofit­eering authority, B N Sharma, has asked the standing committee, part of the anti-profiteeri­ng mechanism, to suggest a simplified version of the form. “We understand the current applicatio­n form is a little complicate­d for a layman. We are in the process of simplifyin­g it. The standing committee is looking into the matter. Meanwhile, people can take help of tax authoritie­s to file a complaint,” Sharma told Business Standard.

The current format of the complaint form requires detailed informatio­n such as sale price, taxes (both before and after GST), benefits of input credits, etc, making it tough for a common man to file a complaint. Besides, one is required to fill in details such as GST identifica­tion number of the company and the six-digit harmonised system of nomenclatu­re (HSN) code of the products. A separate applicatio­n needs to be filed for each good or service for which anti-profiteeri­ng is alleged, making the process tedious. The antiprofit­eering authority has so far received 169 complaints alleging that suppliers of goods or services have not passed on the GST benefits to customers.

Director General of Safeguards, the investigat­ive arm of the department of revenue, has sent out notices to Pyramid Infratech, Honda Motor Vehicles, Lifestyle Internatio­nal and Hardcastle Restaurant­s (the master franchisee of McDonald’s) for not passing on the benefit of the GST to the final consumer. It has asked these firms to provide their balance sheets, trial balance and profit and loss accounts for the past one year.

The anti-profiteeri­ng mechanism is a three-stage process — state-level screening committee for local complaints and a standing committee for national-level complaints; investigat­ion by the Directorat­e General of Safeguards, and a probe by the decision-making body, the the National AntiProfit­eering Authority.

Pratik Jain of PwC India said there was certainly a need to simplify the form for consumers. “Once a prima facie case is establishe­d, the details can then be sought from the business concerned. The entire methodolog­y of conducting the investigat­ion needs to be relooked, including the informatio­n being sought from the businesses.” According to the rules, “Benefits of input tax credit should have been passed on to the recipient by way of commensura­te reduction in prices.” The Confederat­ion of Indian Industry (CII) has argued that this definition was not clear and that discretion­ary bias might creep in. “The rules say benefit of input tax credit should have been passed on to the recipient by way of commensura­te reduction in prices. However, as this definition is not clear, discretion­ary bias may creep in,” a report quoting CII said.

It pressed for clear guidelines on anti-profiteeri­ng for the industry as it could lead to hardship for smaller players. “Another challenge is complicate­d compliance. The government would need to compare the cost of every product before and after GST to determine the amount of tax benefit applicable. Manufactur­ers or suppliers may also deal in several products that are not distinguis­hed in their accounting books, so that determinin­g price margins for individual products will be difficult,” CII says.

“Tax authoritie­s will need to be sensitive to natural business outcomes and avoid undue harassment. Also, the clause gives relatively less time for preparatio­n and adoption of the new provisions.” Bipin Sapra of EY said: “While simplifica­tion of the complaint form would make it easy to file complaints for the common man, it is important for the government to do preliminar­y verificati­on before initiating an inquiry to avoid undue hardship to industry.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India