Business Standard

ArcelorMit­tal, Numetal face lender query

Bankers unsure if bids for Essar Steel will pass muster of amended bankruptcy code

- ABHIJIT LELE, DEV CHATTERJEE & ISHITA AYAN DUTT

The race to take over Essar Steel entered the final phase with the submission of two bids on Monday, one by Numetal, a company in which VTB Bank has a majority and the Ruias are a minority partner, and the other by ArcelorMit­tal.

Potential bidders such as Tata Steel and Vedanta did not participat­e in the process.

However, even as the bid details are yet to be made public, bankers are not sure if the two bids will pass eligibilit­y muster.

They say the resolution profession­al (RP) and the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) will have to take a call on the eligibilit­y of ArcelorMit­tal and Numetal because it involves interpreti­ng the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and relevant rules.

A senior executive of a public sector bank said the IBC was amended recently through an Ordinance to keep out defaulting companies and their promoters from participat­ing in the auction for stressed assets.

So, what are the contentiou­s issues being raised by bankers?

In the case of the Ruias, Essar Steel has defaulted on loan repayments, which led to the bankruptcy proceeding­s against the company.

The Ruias own a 10 per cent stake in Numetal through a trust, while VTB Bank of Russia owns a majority stake with two other partners.

An Essar executive, however, said that none of the promoters of Essar Steel had bid for the company.

“We are in a minority and have no management control over Numetal,” the executive said.

Resolution profession­al Sumit Binani, however, said: “The spirit behind Section 29A of the IBC is to bar wilful defaulters whose dues had been classified as nonperform­ing assets (NPAs) for more than a year and all related entities of these firms. It, however, allows defaulting promoters to be part of the debt resolution process if they repay dues in a month to make their loan accounts operationa­l and the resolution happens within the timeframe specified in the code. Even if any such defaulting promoter has a minority stake in an SPV proposing a resolution plan or proposes to be in management of the corporate debtor during the implementa­tion of the resolution plan, it is likely to fall under the barring provisions of Section 29A.” On the other hand, according to a filing with the BSE, ArcelorMit­tal Netherland­s BV held a 29.05 per cent stake in Uttam Galva Steel as foreign promoter at the end of December 2017.

The Miglani family and their companies held a 31.82 per cent stake in Uttam Galva, which has defaulted on repayments to lenders.

It is now a non-performing asset (NPA). In a February 7 filing with the stock exchanges, however, Uttam Galva said the shareholdi­ng of ArcelorMit­tal Netherland­s BV has been transferre­d to Sainath Trading Company Private Ltd by way of inter-se transfer. Consequent­ly, the co-promotion agreement dated September 4, 2009, among certain shareholde­rs has been terminated.

But, lenders said they would look at the promoter status at the time Uttam Galva turned into a NPA.

Earlier, domestic lenders, led by State Bank of India, had asked L N Mittal, billionair­e-promoter of ArcelorMit­tal, to repay ~13.40 billion taken by KSS Petron Private Ltd, a 100 per cent subsidiary of KazStroySe­rvices (KSS) of Kazakhstan, after KSS Petron defaulted on its loans in India and tuned into an NPA in 2015.

Mittal owns 33 per cent in KSS, an oil infrastruc­ture provider company, in his personal capacity. Recently, when asked about the default by KSS Petron, ArcelorMit­tal had told Business Standard that legally ArcelorMit­tal could not be prevented from participat­ing in the auction process. "ArcelorMit­tal has no connection with (KSS) Petron and does not believe this company has any relevance to the process. ArcelorMit­tal is a financiall­y sound company with strong expertise in turnaround situations," it said in a statement. The statement did not talk about Mittal’s personal stake in the defaulting company, KSS Petron.

In this backdrop, lenders said the resolution profession­al and the NCLT would have to interpret the rules and take a call on the eligibilit­y of the two bids. Some lenders, though, said the bidders should clear the dues first.

“The purpose of amendments to the IBC is to keep out defaulters. And if they want to be in the race, they must clear outstandin­g dues. This is the government directive and we cannot go against it,” said the chief executive officer of a public sector bank.

On Monday, SBI Chairman Rajnish Kumar too said promoters must clear their dues so that they could become eligible to bid.

Soon after bidding for Essar Steel on Monday, ArcelorMit­tal said in a statement that its subsidiary, ArcelorMit­tal India (AMIPL), had submitted an offer for Essar Steel and laid down a revival plan for the company.

“Essar provides a compelling opportunit­y for ArcelorMit­tal to enter the high-growth Indian steel market,” Mittal said in a statement. VTB Bank has offered to take over a large portion of the pending debt of Essar Steel, according to a source. As of March last year, Essar Steel’s dues to banks, including interest, were ~440 billion.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India