Business Standard

Trump’s tax cuts in hand, firms spend more on themselves than on wages

- MATT PHILLIPS

President Trump promised his tax cut would encourage companies to invest in factories, workers and wages, setting off a spending spree that would reinvigora­te the American economy.

Companies have announced plans for some of those investment­s. But so far, companies are using much of the money for something with a more narrow benefit: buying their own shares. Those so-called buybacks are good for shareholde­rs, including the senior executives who tend to be big owners of their companies’ stock. A company purchasing its own shares is a timetested way to bolster its stock price.

But the purchases can come at the expense of investment­s in things like hiring, research and developmen­t and building new plants — the sort of investment­s that directly help the overall economy. The buybacks are also most likely to worsen economic inequality because the benefits of stocks purchases flow disproport­ionately to the richest Americans. The tax overhaul is the cornerston­e of Trump’s economic plan. It has been a big win for companies, offering lower corporate rates and a permanent break on overseas profits. Warren E Buffett said in his annual letter to investors on Saturday that his company, Berkshire Hathaway, enjoyed a $29 billion gain thanks to the new tax law.

As the tax cuts kick in, companies have laid out a variety of uses for the money. Some are paying out one-time bonuses to employees. Others are raising salaries. Others plan to open new factories. In the fourth quarter, American companies’ investment­s in things like factories and business equipment grew by 6.8 per cent. That was the fastest growth rate since 2014, but far from the giant surge in capital spending that was promised ahead of

“RIGHT NOW WE'RE GOING TO HAVE AN ADJUSTMENT WHERE YOU SEE PROBABLY MORE DIVIDENDS AND SHARE BUYBACKS THAN WAGE INCREASES. BUT GOING FORWARD WE’RE GOING TO SEE A LOT OF CAPITAL FORMATION AND WAGE GROWTH” KEVIN HASSETT Head of the White House's Council of Economic Advisors

the tax overhaul. But the buying back of shares is also at record levels. Almost 100 American corporatio­ns have trumpeted such plans in the past month. American companies have announced more than $178 billion in planned buybacks — the largest amount unveiled in a single quarter, according to Birinyi Associates, a market research firm.

Such purchases reduce a company’s total number of outstandin­g shares, giving each remaining share a slightly bigger piece of the profit pie.

Cisco said this month that in response to the tax package, it would bring back to the US $67 billion of overseas cash, using $25 billion to finance additional share repurchase­s. Alphabet, the parent company of Google, authorised up to $8.6 billion in stock purchases. PepsiCo announced a fresh $15 billion in planned buybacks.

On Monday, Buffett said on CNBC that Berkshire might be open to buy some of its shares. The remarks helped send Berkshire’s stock — and the broader market — higher.

More buybacks are almost certainly on the way. UBS analysts covering Apple said the iPhone maker might authorise another $30 billion in share purchases when it reports its next quarterly earnings in April. That would be on top of the $30 billion it already spends each year to buy back its shares. The flurry of planned buybacks has been good for the stock market. Early this month, stocks were down more than 10 per cent from their January peak. The prospect of companies flooding markets with “buy” orders helped the market recoup some of its losses.

The broader impact on the economy is less clear.

At a news conference Thursday, the head of the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers, Kevin Hassett, acknowledg­ed that many companies were spending their money on buying their own shares. “Right now we’re going to have an adjustment where you see probably more dividends and share buybacks than wage increases,” Hassett said. “But going forward we’re going to see a lot of capital formation and wage growth.” That is not what happened in 2005, when a one-time tax holiday allowed companies to repatriate money on the cheap.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India