Business Standard

Too many clamps still in GST rules

- E-mail: tncrajagop­alan@gmail.com

October 1 but did not address the devil in the details. The notificati­ons relating to import under advance authorisat­ion prescribe unnecessar­y and unrealisti­c stipulatio­ns, such as pre-import condition, if IGST exemption is to be taken. The notificati­on relating to import under EPCG authorisat­ion does not allow discharge of export obligation through deemed export if IGST exemption is availed of. Also, any buyer of goods from those availing of IGST exemption for import under advance authorisat­ion or EPCG authorisat­ion or notificati­on applicable for EOUs may export only under Letter of Undertakin­g, without payment of IGST. Import under duty credit scrips will continue to attract IGST.

A review of all these restrictio­ns is overdue. Domestic procuremen­t made under advance authorisat­ion, EPCG authorisat­ion and by EOUs are recognised as ‘deemed export’. With flexibilit­y for either suppliers or buyers to claim refund of GST paid thereon. Exporters have been requesting for grant of upfront exemption or payment of 0.1 per cent GST on such transactio­ns, rather than the mechanism of ‘pay full GST first and then take refund’. Also, if suppliers avail of this refund facility, the buyers cannot export on payment of IGST under rebate claim. Such restrictio­ns curb the flexibilit­y of exporters and, therefore, deserve a review.

The issue receiving attention is the refund of IGST paid on export goods. Considerin­g the large number of mismatches between the data furnished in shipping bills and GSTR-1 returns, the finance ministry has put in place an alternativ­e mechanism for settling of refund claims, involving the interventi­on of Customs officers. The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) has issued a useful circular, clarifying various issues. Its head has asked Customs field formations to conduct camps for clearing all refund claims by end of this month. However, past experience shows such camps are not a great substitute for rationalis­ation of the provisions. A better course would have been to first disburse the refund claims on the basis of shipping bill data and then take up the issue of mismatch. The finance ministry says the GST Council reviewed the progress in grant of refunds to exports of both IGST and Input Tax Credit and appreciate­d that the pace of grant of IGST refund had picked up. The Council relies on inputs from this ministry. However, till the unnecessar­y restrictio­ns on EOUs and other exporters importing their inputs or capital goods availing of IGST exemption or procuring goods from domestic sources under deemed export provisions are removed, the reliefs given to exporters with so many strings attached will mean ‘ease of doing business’ for them only in a very limited way.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India