Business Standard

Sebi board to vet NSE colocation probe report

- SHRIMI CHOUDHARY

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has completed its investigat­ion of 20 brokers in the National Stock Exchange (NSE) colocation (colo) controvers­y.

The regulator in August last year had ordered a joint forensic audit to probe the brokers, who had allegedly gained unfair access to trading data feed between December 2012 and May 2014.

According to sources, the investigat­ion report has a detailed analysis of brokers using the colo facility to churn out thousands of trades and make huge profits.

“There is a high probabilit­y that some brokerages who were using dark fibre connection­s received preferenti­al treatment from bourse officials,” said a person privy to the developmen­t. However, he refused to give further details of the findings.

The report is likely to be tabled in Sebi’s upcoming board meeting on March 28.

Sebi had appointed two audit firms, EY and Deloitte India, to conduct a forensic audit and establish whether there was collusion between the brokers and exchange officials. The firms have conducted the probe under the regulator’s supervisio­n.

Sources say Sebi had independen­tly scanned internal emails of brokers and their communicat­ions with the exchanges.

The brokerages concerned were asked to share informatio­n relating to their agreement with Sampark Infotainme­nt, a company that had provided the dark fibre between the NSE and the BSE. A dark fibre connection was to link colo servers of a broker in two exchanges, enabling them to obtain the stock data and trading informatio­n.

Sources say with this report, Sebi would soon decide action in the matter and pass its final order on the entities involved.

The report could pave the way for the NSE to re-file the consent plea with Sebi for settling the issue. The regulator early this month had returned the NSE’s consent applicatio­n, citing pending investigat­ion.

The NSE, along with some of its former and current employees, had submitted its consent applicatio­n on July 28 last year. Early this month, Sebi had returned the consent pleas, citing pending investigat­ion.

The NSE had said it intended to re-file the applicatio­n after investigat­ions were completed. At present, only the brokers’ audit report on unfair gains is pending.

In November last year, the NSE had submitted two audit reports to Sebi, prepared by EY and the Indian School of Business (ISB). EY was given the mandate to do an audit into the cash, currency derivative­s, and interest rate future segments, while the ISB was to determine whether certain brokers made undue profits by getting preferenti­al access to the exchange’s platform.

Earlier too, the NSE had appointed Deloitte for a forensic audit, which had establishe­d that the trading systems at the NSE colo facility were prone to manipulati­on. But the consulting firm was not able to find evidence that entities in the ecosystem made monetary gains. The report, however, mentioned that preferenti­al treatment might have been given to a few stockbroke­rs. It had said some stockbroke­rs were consistent­ly the first or second people to connect to a fallback secondary server between December 2012 and May 2014. And it said it could not be possible without exchange employees’ knowledge.

The issue at the NSE is related to allowing brokers to set up servers next to the exchange’s trading servers on their premises, popularly known as colocation. This has given these brokers the advantage of getting access to trading data quicker by a split second as compared to other brokers. Based on the internal probe, Sebi had issued show- cause notices to the exchange and 14 officials for alleged violations of securities contracts rules and stock exchange clearing corporatio­n rules. The notice had mentioned failure on the part of NSE officials in ensuring fair access and their non-cooperatio­n during the probe.

If the exchange is held guilty, it will pay the penalty, but if employees, especially former officials, are responsibl­e for the alleged violations, the exchange would not bear the cost, said another person in the know of things.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India