Business Standard

ArcelorMit­tal, Numetal may get 7 days to pay dues

- ABHIJIT LELE & ISHITA AYAN DUTT

The committee of creditors (CoC) in the Essar Steel resolution case met on Saturday and considered giving ArcelorMit­tal and Numetal seven days to clear outstandin­g dues to become eligible.

The CoC would, however, have to vote on the resolution to complete the process and notices to the companies would be issued thereafter, said sources close to the developmen­t. The voting could take place on Monday.

If the resolution goes through, ArcelorMit­tal would have to make payments on account of

Uttam Galva Steels and

KSS Petron to become eligible. Numetal, too, would have make payments to regularise the

Essar account due to

Rewant Ruia’s exposure in the consortium, even though it is a minority and indirect interest.

Numetal did not comment, but legal sources said that it was not liable.

Neither was Aurora

Enterprise­s, of which

Rewant Ruia is the ultimate beneficiar­y. In any case, Numetal had offered to drop Rewant

Ruia, they said.

Lenders acknowledg­ed that while the formalitie­s were being followed in accordance with the order of the Ahmedabad Bench of the National Company

Law Tribunal (NCLT), matters were complicate­d.

Numetal had moved the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) against the NCLT order on grounds that the order of the Bench suggesting a 30-day period for overdue payment for ArcelorMit­tal was not applicable to the company.

ArcelorMit­tal, too, had moved the NCLAT against observatio­ns made by the Ahmedabad Bench and to set aside its disqualifi­cation. Both the pleas would be heard on May 17.

The NCLT Bench had remanded the first round of bids in Essar back to the resolution profession­al and the CoC for considerat­ion and rendered the second round of bids legally unsound.

In the case of ArcelorMit­tal, the Bench had said that the sale of shares and declassifi­cation did not absolve them from responsibi­lity and pointed towards payment of overdue amount for Uttam Galva and KSS Petron as a cure.

In line with the NCLT order, last Wednesday, ArcelorMit­tal and Numetal were invited to make presentati­ons before the CoC on their eligibilit­y.

Sources close to ArcelorMit­tal subsequent­ly indicated that it would consider making repayment of dues on account of Uttam Galva and KSS, if required, as a “goodwill gesture”. The dues could be around ~70 billion. So far, ArcelorMit­tal has offered ~53 billion to banks on account of Uttam Galva, subject to reconcilia­tion.

ArcelorMit­tal has emerged the higher bidder in the first round of bids. Numetal, though, has subsequent­ly offered to match and better ArcelorMit­tal’s offer, provided lenders did not consider ArcelorMit­tal’s offer.

Sources close to the developmen­t anticipate a spate of litigation. Lenders were also keen on opening the second round of bids, an idea that was discussed on Saturday. But that too could be challenged by any of the bidders in the first round.

In the second round of bids, Vedanta had joined the fray, while JSW Steel had partnered Numetal. Vedanta recently wrote to the CoC for considerat­ion of its bid in the interest of maximisati­on of value.

The resolution profession­al, based on legal advice, had rejected ArcelorMit­tal and Numetal on grounds of eligibilit­y and called for a second round of bids.

ArcelorMit­tal sold its stake in Uttam Galva and L N Mittal in KazStroySe­rvice (KSS), two companies that were classified as non-performing assets for more than a year, ahead of the bid for Essar. However, ArcelorMit­tal was deemed ineligible because it was a promoter of Uttam Galva in the records of stock exchanges.

Numetal was disqualifi­ed by the resolution profession­al on grounds of eligibilit­y because Rewant Ruia, son of Ravi Ruia, was the ultimate beneficiar­y of Aurora Enterprise­s, one of the shareholde­rs of Numetal. Ravi Ruia is the promoter of Essar Steel. The NCLT in its order said that the Essar Steel’s resolution profession­al had not placed the resolution plans of both the companies before the CoC for considerat­ion before rejecting them on grounds of violating Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India