Business Standard

FMCG companies told to do profiteeri­ng math

Authority in talks with Reckitt, Godrej, P&G over GST rate cut benefits

- DILASHA SETH & ARNAB DUTTA

The National Anti-Profiteeri­ng Authority is calling large fast-moving consumer goods companies to understand if last November’s GST rate cut benefits were passed on to consumers.

Only two FMCG companies, Hindustan Unilever and Nestle, have approached the quasi-judicial body voluntaril­y. The GST benefits include both rate cuts and input tax credit available. The GST Council had reduced rates for over 200 items of common use on November 10 and the changes came into effect from November 15.

The authority has held hour-long meetings with Reckitt Benckiser, Godrej, P&G, Nirma and Marico among a dozen companies at its Delhi office to understand if they had passed on benefits to consumers and to what extent. Meetings with more companies have been planned. “We

are holding informal discussion­s with firms for their feedback on the GST and to understand if they have passed on entire benefit to consumers,” an official said.

In case the authority is not satisfied with a company’s computatio­n, it may ask GST commission­ers to file an anti-profiteeri­ng complaint.

The industry is, however, concerned over the lack of clear profiteeri­ng guidelines. Also there is no formula to calculate the benefits due.

According to sources, the majority of the FMCG companies that the authority has met so far have failed to agree with it over the quantum of benefits that remains due. The companies blame large inventorie­s based on an older pricing formula for their failure to pass on all the benefits.

Marico and Reckitt Benckiser said they were not in a position to comment at the moment. Queries sent to Nirma, P&G and Godrej remained unanswered.

“Scrutiny of the cost structures of FMCG companies without an approved common methodolog­y to determine whether the benefits were passed on will be a difficult task, “said M S Mani, partner, Deloitte India. In many cases, stock with trade on the transition date would be difficult to determine from a profiteeri­ng perspectiv­e, he added.

“Since these meetings could lead to a formal enquiry, industry needs to be prepared with adequate documentat­ion,” said Pratik Jain, partner, PwC India. He added it was important for the authoritie­s to understand industry’s concerns, as no guidelines had been issued by the government on compliance. “One will not be surprised if these meetings extend beyond the FMCG sector in the next few days,” Jain said.

An ITC spokespers­on said, “We have passed on the benefits of the GST rate cuts to customers and this has been communicat­ed to the relevant authoritie­s.’ The spokespers­on declined to elaborate.

The two factors mentioned in the statutory provisions cannot determine profiteeri­ng and hence other factors such as incrementa­l cost of doing business needs to be looked into, according to Abhishek A Rastogi, partner at law firm Khaitan & Co.

Hindustan Unilever and Nestle have offered to pay the profiteere­d amount. Hindustan Unilever calculated a profiteere­d amount of Rs 1.60 billion and offered it to the government. Nestle is assessing the final amount. Hindustan Unilever is yet to deposit the money with the government as it awaits instructio­ns related to bank account details.

The anti-profiteeri­ng mechanism is a three-stage process. There is a state-level screening committee for local complaints and a standing committee for national-level complaints; then, investigat­ion by the Directorat­e General of Safeguards and a probe by the National AntiProfit­eering Authority.

The authority is chaired by BN Sharma, is assisted by four officials of the rank of joint secretary and above.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India