Business Standard

A self-goal

Rahul Gandhi’s comments overseas do him no favours

-

Irreverent commentato­rs in India may have designated Rahul Gandhi the Pappu (little boy) of Indian politics, an inadequate and slightly comic challenger to Narendra Modi, Bharatiya Janata Party’s talismanic leader. When he makes formal public appearance­s overseas, however, foreign government­s have to take him more seriously and assess him in his capacity as the president of the Congress, the country’s most significan­t opposition party. In that sense, such platforms offer him a good opportunit­y to enhance his credibilit­y. In the past, in the US and Singapore, he had displayed poise and charm in fending off questions about his dynastic credential­s. Perhaps it is an indication of the stress of impending parliament­ary elections in 2019 that his performanc­e in Europe last week did neither him nor his cause any favours.

A gathering of non-resident Indians and foreigners in Hamburg, Germany, would have been an opportune occasion for spelling out the agenda of his party or that of the Opposition coalition that he purports to head. Instead, Mr Gandhi chose to focus on the failures of the Modi government — demonetisa­tion, the hasty implementa­tion of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), the lack of job creation. Then, he went on to link the outbreak of lynchings to growing unemployme­nt and equate this trend to the rise of the Islamic State. In London, he doubled down on this erratic performanc­e by, first, comparing the Rashtriya Swayamseva­k Sangh (RSS) to the Muslim Brotherhoo­d, insisting that the Congress was not involved in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots, and asserting, without corroborat­ing evidence, that Chinese troops are still present on Bhutan’s Doklam plateau.

Several issues arise from these varied, freewheeli­ng pronouncem­ents. It is nobody’s case that demonetisa­tion, GST or job creation are this government’s successes, nor is the record of lynchings of Muslims and Dalits under this regime something that Indians would speak of with pride. But is it acceptable for Mr Gandhi to criticise the Indian government on foreign soil? His and his party’s contention that Mr Modi has done the same to the Congress in the past is neither here nor there; one wrong does not justify another. In fact, by emulating an opponent’s unethical practices — that too someone he is seeking to discredit — Mr Gandhi has only emphasised his own callowness, the quality he struggles to overcome in domestic politics.

Mr Gandhi would also have done better to acquaint himself with some basic facts before he made sweeping pronouncem­ents. To deny the Congress’ role in the 1984 riots ignores not just serial verdicts by the Indian judicial system but also the apology in Parliament by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in 2011 — not so long ago for the 48-year-old Congress president to have forgotten. Moreover, allegation­s linking the RSS to the Muslim Brotherhoo­d betray an embarrassi­ng ignorance about the provenance of the two organisati­ons and their objectives. Third, he levelled serious allegation­s against the government’s foreign policy — just after claiming that he lacked the details to explain how he would have handled the Doklam crisis differentl­y. One can only imagine his experience­d colleagues in the Congress and in the Opposition coalition cringing at this performanc­e. Mr Gandhi’s claim as a credible future prime ministeria­l candidate looks uncertain indeed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India