PANEL WANTS EASY CAPITAL ADEQUACY NORMS FOR PSBs

A parliamentary committee has urged the Reserve Bank of India to relax the capital adequacy norms for at least nine out of 21 public sector banks. This may free up capital up to ~5.34 trillion, helping the expansion oflenders. Thestanding committee on finance, in its latestreport, hascriticisedt he capital-adequacy by the RBI and termed them“stringent .”

A parliamentary committee has urged the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to relax capital adequacy norms for at least nine out of 21 public sector banks (PSBs) that may free up capital up to ~5.34 trillion.

The standing committee on finance, in its latest report, has criticised the capital-adequacy requirements set by the RBI and termed them “stringent”.

The committee noted that the Basel framework required the application of capital standards to “internationally active banks.” Nine PSBs — Central Bank of India, Andhra Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC), Corporation Bank, Vijaya Bank, Bank of Maharashtra, United Bank of India, Dena Bank, and Punjab and Sind Bank — are not internationally active, it said, making a case of easing capital adequacy norms for them.

Banks are required to maintain a minimum capital, in terms of capital-to-risky asset ratio (CRAR) and common equity tier (CET)-1, to ensure they do not lend all the money they receive as deposits and keep a buffer to meet future risks. Capital adequacy ratio of banks is considered to be one of the key indicators of banks’ health.

Basel-III, an international regulatory framework for banks, is being implemented in India in phases since April 2013, and will be fully implemented by March next year. The RBI requires banks to maintain CRAR, including capital-conservation buffer, at 11.5 per cent — 1 per cent higher than global Basel norms. The CET-1 of banks must be at least 5.5 per cent of its risk-weighted assets — 1 per cent higher than the global norms.

“Such stringent norms stipulated by the RBI for our banks… which are not internationally active at all, is unrealistic and unwarranted,” the committee said.

The committee called for easing the “additional” capital requirement set by the RBI over the global norms which will obviate the need for additional capital infusion into these nine PSBs from the Union Budget. These nine banks had aggregate risk-weighted assets of around ~9.93 trillion, which means the banks would require additional capital of around ~350 billion.

“…If waived, (it) will release huge funds to the extent of approximately ~5.34 trillion, representing 51 per cent growth in the loan book of these banks, generating additional interest income of around ~500 billion annually,” the committee added.

The committee asked the government and the RBI to defer the time frame for full implementation of Basel-III norms from March 2019 looking at the financial position of PSBs. In the first quarter of this financial year, PSBs posted a collective loss of over ~166 billion, with only seven out of 21 state-owned banks posting profits. However, the RBI did not favour deferment of timeline in implementing the Basel-III norms, in its submission to the panel as it seeks to address a lot of shortcomings.

“It is imperative these regulations are implemented within the laid-out timelines. As a leading and globally interlinked emerging market economy, India can ill-afford to be seen as lagging behind in implementation of globally accepted norms on banking regulation. In several areas, the implementation has been deferred in alignment with deferment by the Basel committee on Banking Supervision,” the RBI said.

The CRAR of the banking system had marginally improved to 13.80 per cent till December 31, 2017, from 13.66 per cent as on March 31, 2017, the panel noted.