Business Standard

FIVE SUBSIDIARI­ES WIPED OUT ALL IL&FS PROFIT FOR FY18

- SACHIN P MAMPATTA

A power company, a maritime infrastruc­ture company, a metro rail project, a tunnel and a border checkpost in Madhya Pradesh wiped out more capital for beleaguere­d infrastruc­ture player IL&FS than all its other activities put together.

Subsidiari­es involved in these projects had a collective loss of ~13.2 billion for the financial year ending March 2018 or 70 per cent of the consolidat­ed loss for IL&FS of ~18.9 billion.

The subsidiari­es involved are IL&FS Tamil Nadu Power Company, IL&FS Maritime Infrastruc­ture Company, Rapid MetroRail Gurgaon South, Chenani Nashri Tunnelway and MP Border Checkpost Developmen­t Company. IL&FS had either majority or 100 per cent shareholdi­ng in all these.

This is not to say that other projects had an easier time. For example, its investment in Dighi Port (DPL) had already landed in insolvency.

“The recovery of the value of equity shares of DPL will largely depend upon the positive outcome of the business revival plan, resolution process of the NCLT (the insolvency tribunal) and additional infusion of equity capital. The company is confident of resolution of the matter. It had, in the earlier year, recognised impairment loss of ~744 million,” noted the annual report.

Other project subsidiari­es have faced issues on account of ‘material reaches/defaults by authoritie­s’ of their agreements. The company said it had claimed damages and was looking at the possibilit­y of terminatin­g the contracts if no satisfacto­ry resolution was arrived at.

“The Group is carrying intangible assets aggregatin­g to ~74,478.7 million with respect to these subsidiari­es and the management is confident of recovering the above amounts,” went the annual report.

This has meant many large subsidiari­es had significan­tly higher liabilitie­s than assets. Key companies in which this was seen, according to annual report numbers, include IL&FS Financial Services (minus ~23,997.49 million), IL&FS Energy Developmen­t Company (minus ~49,185.86 million).

IL&FS Tamil Nadu Power Company (minus ~30,659.82 million) and IL&FS Transporta­tion Networks (minus ~41,812.98 million).

The degree of stress has not been uniformly recognised. For example, a report from foreign brokerage Nomura Financial Advisory and Securities noted difference­s in the way that banks have treated the debt of IL&FS Energy Developmen­t Company.

“We understand that there is a difference in NPA (non-performing asset) recognitio­n by banks for this asset,” said the September 11 note, titled ‘Assessing risk from IL&FS Group’, authored by research analysts Adarsh Parasrampu­ria, Amit Nanavati and Riddhi Jain.

A total of 121 of the over 200 subsidiari­es, joint ventures and associates recorded some loss during the financial year ending in 2018. Ninety of the entities recorded some profit.

There had been worry that their underperfo­rmance and recent defaults could result in a contagion in the country’s financial markets. Public sector banks (PSBs) have greater exposure.

“Of the ~ 365 billion of debt we could locate for subsidiary companies of IL&FS Group, PSBs hold 70 per cent of the debt, private banks hold less than 10 per cent and large institutio­ns/ Life Insurance Corporatio­n/foreign banks hold the rest,” noted the Nomura report.

They lost more money than was made by the holding company and 200-odd other subsidiari­es, joint ventures and associates put together

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India