Business Standard

BAT SUGGESTION TO BUY BACK SHARES NOT AN OPTION: ITC

Says regulation­s in India do not allow companies to hold shares that can be distribute­d to staff

- ISHITA AYAN DUTT

British American Tobacco (BAT), which turned down ITC’s proposal for issuing employee stock option plans (ESOPs), has suggested the diversifie­d conglomera­te consider buying shares in the market. “We are supportive of plans to incentivis­e executives and employees of ITC with company shares as long as the incentivis­ation is not done in a manner that is dilutive to ITC shareholde­rs. This could include buying shares for issuing ESOPs...,” a BAT spokespers­on said. ISHITA AYAN DUTT writes

British American Tobacco (BAT), which turned down ITC’s proposal for issuing employee stock option schemes (ESOPs), has suggested that the diversifie­d conglomera­te could consider buying shares in the market for the purpose.

“We support plans to incentivis­e executives and employees of ITC with company shares as long as the incentivis­ation is not done in a manner which is dilutive for ITC shareholde­rs. This could include buying shares in the market for issuing ESOPs, which a number of other large and wellrespec­ted Indian companies have done in recent years,” a BAT spokespers­on said.

However, a buyback for ESOP was not an option for ITC. “The buyback of shares by the company to grant options to employees is not feasible as unlike the UK, regulation­s in India do not allow companies to hold shares bought back as treasury shares, which can be distribute­d to employees,” a ITC spokespers­on said.

ITC’s last ESOP was in 2010 but the scheme had been modified this time.

“Stock option schemes have in the past worked well in ensuring the continued alignment of the interests of employees with those of shareholde­rs. Ever since equity-linked incentives have been extended to eligible employees, the total shareholde­r returns generated by the company have grown at a compound annual growth rate of around 20 per cent, significan­tly outperform­ing the stock market. The board, after taking due considerat­ion of all issues at the meeting, recommende­d to the shareholde­rs the introducti­on of a Stock Appreciati­on Rights Scheme as the proposed new scheme is an optimal option in the interests of all shareholde­rs as it leads to minimum addition to share capital,” the ITC spokespers­on said.

The current scheme would have resulted in a dilution of 0.6 per cent for BAT over 14 years. “We are surprised and disappoint­ed that the special resolution recommende­d by the board of directors of the company for approval of the shareholde­rs has not been approved primarily on account of the overseas shareholde­r, who chose to vote against the resolution,” the ITC spokespers­on added. ITC informed the stock exchanges about this on October 4.

The plan got 63.49 per cent votes in favour against a requisite majority of 75 per cent. While 98.77 per cent of the institutio­ns voted in favour of it, 89.22 per cent of the non-institutio­nal public shareholde­rs (which included BAT) voted against it.

BAT’s current holding in ITC is 29.71 per cent. BAT said that in the past, dilutive executive share schemes were very typical and BAT had voted for them. “There has been a clear movement, over time, for companies to adopt non-dilutive executive compensati­on plans. BAT has adopted this approach with respect to its own senior executive share schemes. We have been very clear since 2010 that we would not be supportive of any future proposals that are dilutive to the shareholde­rs of ITC,” the BAT spokespers­on said.

BAT, however, said it supported the ITC management. “This is simply and importantl­y a matter of our fiduciary duty to our shareholde­rs and does not in any way undermine our support for the ITC management and employees,” the BAT spokespers­on explained.

BAT is unable to raise its stake in ITC as a result of restrictio­ns on non-Indian firms purchasing further shares in Indian tobacco companies. India closed its doors on new foreign direct investment in cigarettes in 2010. The ban applied to new proposals and existing equity stakes held by overseas firms.

At that time BAT had told Business Standard, “We have 32 per cent in ITC and are very happy with our investment. We have no intentions of increasing our stake in ITC. Our business in India is done only through ITC and therefore the government ruling will have no impact.”

However, whether BAT will review its intent if FDI rules are relaxed is not known.

On September 25, BAT announced its chief executive officer (CEO) succession. Jack Bowles, chief operating officer of BAT’s internatio­nal business, will succeed Nicandro Durandro Durante as CEO following Nicandro’s retirement on April 1.

BAT and ITC have a history of spat that dates back to 1994, when the British multinatio­nal wanted to wrest control of ITC by increasing its stake to 51 per cent but then ITC chairman Krishnan Lal Chugh threw a spanner in the works. It escalated to a point where BAT demanded the resignatio­n of Chugh and blocked ITC’s diversific­ation into power in 1995. But over the years, equations on both sides has changed under Yogesh Chander Deveshwar.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India