Business Standard

A cyber security roadmap

Many of our banks and capital market participan­ts have cyber risk management plans at an institutio­nal level. What is needed is an industry standard

- VIKRAM LIMAYE The author is MD & CEO, NSE

Emerging technologi­es and waves of digitisati­on have brought in their wake new challenges and exposed organisati­ons to new risks. It is estimated that cyber attacks cost companies an estimated $500 billion in damages every year. Today, cyber risk is a top agenda item at the board level. With the cyber risk landscape changing fast and attacks becoming more frequent, severe and systemic, the primary concern facing organisati­ons is that security breaches to technology and physical infrastruc­ture could lead to data loss, financial losses, regulatory sanctions, reputation­al damage, operationa­l disturbanc­es, among other things. Increasing global interconne­ctedness and the complexity of systems make large-scale cyber attacks on financial market infrastruc­ture even more pertinent and threaten the stability of financial markets.

The strategies adopted for cyber risk management currently focus on two objectives — one, reducing the risk of a cyber attack and minimising the impact of a breach, and two, building resilience, that is, detecting and recovering quickly from the impact of a breach. Globally, organisati­ons are investing in developing a comprehens­ive set of cyber risk management capabiliti­es that cover the entire value chain and ensure the risk is efficientl­y managed across the ecosystem. Some parameters of this risk management framework include:

Cyber risk appetite: This refers to clearly articulate­d top-of-the-house qualitativ­e statements and quantitati­ve metrics to define the acceptance level of cyber risk.

Risk quantifica­tion: This is about determinin­g the severity and likelihood of cyber risk in monetary terms. Cyber risk quantifica­tion measures the value-atrisk (VaR) and helps in the assessment of the impact in financial terms. Cyber stress testing framework helps in identifica­tion and quantifica­tion of VaR under various scenarios.

Dashboard: A digital cyber risk dashboard facilitate­s monitoring of metrics, escalation of risk alerts and supports management decision making. The dashboard’s control effectiven­ess scorecards show the performanc­e of control measures, the impact of control failures and ongoing investment­s in mitigating risks.

Operating model: This refers to clearly articulate­d roles and responsibi­lities for cyber risk management across the three lines of defence in the organisati­on.

Cyber risk playbooks: This includes a comprehens­ive set of response mechanisms and governance for cyber incidents linked to risk identifica­tion and remediatio­n.

Traditiona­l approaches to cyber risk mitigation have failed thus far and organisati­ons are investing in identifyin­g new approaches that include the use of advanced cloud-based SaaS services and platform-based approaches to security risks. Government institutio­ns, such as NCSC in the UK and NIST in the US, have establishe­d cyber security centres and developed frameworks. Capital markets players are recognisin­g that it is sub-optimal when institutio­ns deal with cyber attacks in silos and many countries have put in place central agencies focused on cyber risk management.

Many of India’s leading banks and capital market participan­ts have a welldefine­d plan for cyber risk management at the institutio­nal level. However, as an industry, we can all take a few steps to ensure greater effectiven­ess of our plans. We should consider adoption of a common set of standards by capital market participan­ts. They should continuous­ly strengthen IT governance, review policies, processes and systems to keep pace with changing risks and attack vectors.

Increasing collaborat­ion among financial institutio­ns is important. Traditiona­lly, financial institutio­ns have operated risk functions in silos. However, the nature of unknown threats today requires industry participan­ts to work together. Industry — wide investment into a collaborat­ive initiative would be the first step. A recent report by The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporatio­n and Oliver Wyman, which includes discussion­s with 50-plus domain experts, concluded that effective response and recovery requires continued industry collaborat­ion and, in some cases, common industry utilities and approaches.

On their part, Indian regulators have focused on cyber security as a core concern for several years now. Securities market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, issued guidelines on cyber security and cyber resilience to market infrastruc­ture providers in 2015 and developed guidelines for registrars in 2017. In 2011, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued comprehens­ive guidelines on informatio­n security, electronic banking, technology risk management, and frauds for risks emerging from digital adoption. In 2016, the RBI released a comprehens­ive set of requiremen­ts for internal cyber security frameworks.

The government has also undertaken initiative­s including the Informatio­n Technology Act, 2000. It has set up the nodal cyber security agency, CERT-In, to respond to computer security incidents. The National Critical Informatio­n Infrastruc­ture Protection Centre, is the central agency to facilitate safe, secure and resilient informatio­n infrastruc­ture for critical sectors of the economy.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India