Business Standard

Direct tax collection falls in six states; UP and Rajasthan worst performers

Mop-up in Uttar Pradesh fell by almost 20% to ~235 billion in 2017-18, from ~293 billion in 2016-17

- ISHAN BAKSHI

Direct tax collection­s declined in six states in 2017-18, the latest data released by the income tax department shows. Among the larger states, the sharpest decline was seen in Uttar Pradesh, followed by Rajasthan and Bihar.

Mizoram, Nagaland, and Sikkim are the other states from where collection­s have fallen. Collection­s have also fallen from the Union Territory of Daman and Diu.

At the aggregate level, total direct tax collection­s rose by 18 per cent in 2017-18, rising to ~10 trillion, up from ~8.49 trillion in 2016-17.

However, collection­s from Uttar Pradesh fell by almost 20 per cent to ~235 billion in 2017-18, from ~293 billion in 2016-17. Similarly, in Rajasthan, collection­s fell by 4.8 per cent to ~192 billion in 2017-18 from ~201.8 billion the year before, while the mop up from Bihar declined by 3.6 per cent to ~62.8 billion, from ~65 billion the year before.

It’s difficult to know for sure the precise explanatio­n for the fall in tax collection­s in these states. Slower economic growth is unlikely to be the reason as these states have seen healthy growth.

For instance, Uttar Pradesh’s economy grew at 10 per cent in 2017- 18 (current prices), marginally higher than 9.9 per cent in 2016-17. However, Rajasthan grew at 10.7 per cent in 2017-18, marginally lower than 11 per cent in 2016-17, while Bihar grew at 14.5 per cent, down from 15.3 per cent over the same period.

A possible explanatio­n for the decline in collection­s from these states in 2017-18 could be traced to the sharp surge in tax collection­s in the previous year – 2016-17 — analysts Business Standard spoke to said.

For instance, tax collection­s from UP increased by 17.3 per cent in 201617, the period of demonetisa­tion, after contractin­g by 8 per cent in 2015-16. Similarly, collection­s from Rajasthan grew by a staggering 51.1 per cent in 2016-17, after growing by a mere 1.5 per cent the previous year. By comparison, at the aggregate level, tax collection­s grew by 14.6 per cent in 2016-17.

In the northeaste­rn states, the differenti­al is of a much higher magnitude. In Mizoram and Nagaland, tax collection­s grew by a staggering 117.5 per cent and 298 per cent respective­ly in 2016-17, after growing at 29 per cent and 32.6 per cent in the previous year, respective­ly.

The sharp surge observed in tax collection­s from these states could have been on account of demonetisa­tion. This is unlikely to have sustained in the subsequent years said an economist who Business Standard spoke to.

However, this sharp uptick in collection­s in 2016-17 is not observed in Maharashtr­a, Delhi and Karnataka, which account for bulk of direct tax collection­s. For instance, growth in tax collection­s from Delhi actually fell to 7.1 per cent in 2016-17, from 11.4 per cent in 2015-16. In Karnataka, it grew marginally from 18.9 per cent to 19.3 per cent, while in Maharashtr­a, it rose from 3.3 per cent to 9.4 per cent during the same period.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India