Business Standard

Fast fashion’s new trend

Two engaging films look at the fast fashion industry from opposite ends and reveal its true cost, writes Indira Kannan

- INDIRA KANNAN

Two engaging films look at the fast fashion industry from opposite ends and reveal its true cost, writes

The labels are a common sight on the racks of most fast fashion stores in the West — Made in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Guatemala or any other developing country, including India. The clothes change several times in a season, and are meant to be worn while they are trendy — it could be balloon sleeves one month, raw hems on ripped jeans the next. Or it could be colours that are in fashion — as Meryl Streep memorably explained to a naïve Anne Hathaway in The Devil Wears Prada how “cerulean blue” trickled down to street fashion.

Pricing and turnaround are key in this industry — the price tags must appeal to young budget-conscious shoppers and the collection­s must hit the shelves when the tastemaker­s are still sporting those trends — a shipment of moto leggings that lands in stores when the Instagram influencer­s have moved on to lace-trimmed shorts would be, like, so out of date. The pipeline that keeps this market going is less attractive — factories in developing countries where employees — mostly women — work long hours in unhealthy conditions to churn out pieces that may be discarded in a few weeks.

Slowly, however, the trend of trendy clothes at throwaway prices is itself showing signs of change. American fast fashion behemoth Forever 21, recently filed for bankruptcy in the US and Canada, and announced it would close hundreds of stores worldwide. European chains like H&M and Zara have also seen slowing sales in recent years. Industry experts point to a mix of factors as the reason, including a steady growth in online retail, and a greater awareness among consumers today about the sustainabi­lity of a throwaway culture and questions about how cheap clothes are produced.

In an interestin­g juxtaposit­ion at this year’s Toronto Internatio­nal Film Festival, two engaging films looked at this industry from opposite ends. Made in Bangladesh, a film by Rubaiyat Hossain, shows viewers where and how cheap fashion is manufactur­ed. British filmmaker Michael Winterbott­om’s Greed, on the other hand, follows the exploits of an unscrupulo­us billionair­e owner of a fast fashion empire.

Hossain uses a serious approach to narrate the story of Shimu, a garment factory worker in Dhaka, and her struggle to organise her co-workers in the face of strong opposition at work and at home. The subject is especially relevant to Bangladesh, which is the world’s second largest exporter of readymade garments. The sector accounts for four-fifths of the country’s exports and about a fifth of the country’s economy. In an interview, Hossain explained why she chose to focus on this sector for her latest film: “Garment industry was an obvious choice. Also, Bangladesh is now becoming a middle-income economy, and how is that happening? It’s happening because of these women.”

But the women are often forced to work under hideous conditions for minimum wages that are a fraction of those in the West. A series of disasters in Bangladesh in recent years drove home this point, the most infamous of them being the Rana Plaza collapse in Dhaka in 2013. The death toll of over 1,100 from the collapse of the building that housed garment factories employing over 5,000 workers, shocked the world when it emerged that clothes from several well-known brands like Benetton, Joe Fresh and Primark had been manufactur­ed there, and that the workers had been ordered to work that day despite reports of damage to the building the previous day. Just a few months earlier, a fire at a garment factory in Dhaka had killed over a hundred workers.

Made in Bangladesh is a powerful voice for these workers. Shimu, played confidentl­y by Bangladesh­i actor Rikita Nandini Shimu, is the assertive voice in the film, rallying co-workers who are routinely abused and exploited by their employers and their families. “These women are the driving force of the Bangladesh economy but there is very little recognitio­n for them,” says Hossain. “People look down on them because they are poor or they are factory workers.”

They are also exploited by fashion retailers in the West, and indirectly, by their consumers. The protagonis­t of Greed, named Sir Richard Mccreadie, is a ruthless businessma­n, determined to drive down costs, no matter what it takes. In a scene, he explains why he started sourcing clothes from a factory in Sri Lanka rather than from one in Leicester — the worker in Leicester would earn 2.88 pounds an hour, as against 50 pence for the one in Sri Lanka — and, he adds, that’s 50pence for a day, not an hour. If another factory owner was willing to pay his workers even less and sell his clothes cheaper to Mccreadie, he would gladly switch suppliers.

Speaking at TIFF, Winterbott­om said he was taken aback by the sheer scale of the problem while working on his script. “I didn’t realise how big the industry is,” he said, adding that he found “97 per cent of the clothes sold in the US were made abroad” and that “the real numbers of the wage gap were shocking”.

In contrast to Hossain’s approach, Winterbott­om effectivel­y uses satire to skewer the sellers of fast fashion. Greed’s Mccreadie is clearly a caricature of Philip Green, the billionair­e founder of the troubled British fashion chain Topshop. After a screening in Toronto, Winterbott­om said the film and its characters were fictional, but added, “Anything that you find absurd or extreme — remember, the reality is much worse”. Indeed, the setting for the film is the Greek island of Mykonos, on the eve of an extravagan­t 60th birthday party for Mccreadie, to be attended by global A-listers.

The tycoon is played in flamboyant fashion by Steve Coogan, as he readies for an opulent bash that he hopes will repair his image in the midst of ongoing investigat­ions into his business. Guests are all to be decked out in Roman costumes, and a key part of the entertainm­ent is a real lion flown out to the island for a gladiator-type event. But all the arrangemen­ts are running behind schedule, and a group of refugees has come ashore and camped out at a nearby beach, rather spoiling the view. Mccreadie wants them evicted for the sake of his guests, because, as he explains without any sense of irony, “some of them are quite superficia­l”. As celebrity guests start dropping out fearing bad publicity from associatin­g with Mccreadie, an assistant suggests hiring lookalikes and confining them to dimly lit areas so that paparazzi photograph­ers don’t catch on. Another assistant’s history is tied to Mccreadie in an unexpected way, and as you might expect from this chaotic arrangemen­t, the lion plays a pivotal role in the climax.

Through the biting humour, Winterbott­om manages to highlight the prevalent practices in the fast fashion industry to inform consumers in the West. In describing Greed, TIFF’S co-head and artistic director Cameron Bailey says, “This needle-sharp satire…rips open the contract that offers cheap clothes to buyers, vast wealth to owners, and punishing conditions to workers.” Winterbott­om says he made the film to draw attention to the issues, not to offer solutions, which, he believes must come from consumers: “It’s to make you think that when buying a $10 t-shirt, it’s not a piece of Beyonce I’m buying, but the woman who made it.”

Public outrage and pressure in the wake of the Rana Plaza accident led to corporate initiative­s to improve safety measures and inspection­s of factories, although these cover only a small portion of the industry. There is also increasing awareness of the pollution caused by mass manufactur­ing and mass disposal of used clothes. It’s an especially topical subject at this time— the World Premieres of Greed and Made in Bangladesh at TIFF last month also coincided with Penguin Random House publishing Fashionopo­lis: The Price of Fast Fashion and the Future of Clothes, by veteran fashion journalist Dana Thomas. The works help buyers see the hidden message on the tags of their cheap chic: Those deep discounts mask some steep costs.

 ??  ?? follows the exploits of an unscrupulo­us billionair­e owner of a fast fashion empire
follows the exploits of an unscrupulo­us billionair­e owner of a fast fashion empire
 ??  ?? Made in Bangladesh ( left) takes a serious approach to narrate the story of garment factory workers in Dhaka, while Greed
Made in Bangladesh ( left) takes a serious approach to narrate the story of garment factory workers in Dhaka, while Greed

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India