Business Standard

Job crisis signal

Young people opting for MGNREGA work is worrying

-

The Indian economy is in the midst of a severe slowdown and the data suggests that a sharp recovery in the near term is unlikely. Apart from the lead indicators such as vehicle sales, which tend to grab headlines, developmen­ts on the ground are also not encouragin­g. An increase in the number of young workers lining up for work under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is a case in point. As a recent report in The Indian Express showed, the number of workers employed in the age group of 18-30 under the MGNREGA reached 7.07 million in 2018-19 compared to 5.8 million in 2017-18. The number had declined significan­tly after 201314. More people are seeking work under the Act in the current year as well.

While reasons for this shift are worth investigat­ing, a higher enrolment of people in the 18-30 age bracket in the subsistenc­e-level job guarantee programme prima facie means severe lack of employment opportunit­ies. The gross domestic product data for the April-june quarter, for instance, showed that growth in the constructi­on sector declined to 5.7 per cent, while expansion in the manufactur­ing sector collapsed to 0.6 per cent. Subdued activity in these sectors and their inability to absorb labour could have pushed workers to seek employment under the MGNREGA. It is also likely that distress in agricultur­e could have affected the demand for labour in rural areas.

However, there is another important aspect that needs policy attention. A 2017 discussion paper by the NITI Aayog showed that about two-thirds of income in rural India is now generated through non-agricultur­al activities. About half the constructi­on and manufactur­ing sector output comes from rural areas. It also contribute­s significan­tly to the services sector output. It would be interestin­g to see if manufactur­ing units in rural areas are losing out because of size and greater formalisat­ion of the economy after the implementa­tion of the goods and services tax. Although manufactur­ing units in rural areas are more capitalint­ensive, pressure on output could have had an impact on employment.

At a broader level, the inability of the Indian economy to create enough jobs can have longer-term consequenc­es. As the latest Economic Survey noted, India is witnessing a demographi­c transition with a significan­t increase in the proportion of the working-age population. The working-age population in absolute terms is likely to grow by about 9.7 million per year between 2021 and 2031. Growth will slow in the subsequent years. India cannot afford to lose this opportunit­y. It will not be able to take advantage of a rising workforce without creating enough employment opportunit­ies. Clearly, as the evidence suggests, this is not happening at the moment. A trend reversal will require more investment, which will help generate jobs. In this context, the government has done well to reduce the corporate tax rate and, over the last few years, India has moved up significan­tly in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business ranking. However, as World Bank President David Malpass has rightly noted, India needs to do a lot more, particular­ly in areas such as land registrati­on and contract enforcemen­t, to attract investment. Therefore, the pace of reforms must be accelerate­d. Only higher investment and rapid growth can create sufficient employment opportunit­ies. The situation forcing young workers to enrol for the MGNREGA work needs to be reversed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India