Business Standard

Give us the numbers

-

This refers to “Let the military prove its worth” and “Need to constantly verify facts...”, both authored by Ajai Shukla, who has been frequently writing about IndiaChina confrontat­ion on the LAC. Shukla occasional­ly contribute­s in The New York

Times also. In “Caught between Indian and Chinese troops” ( NYT, July 12), Jeffrey Gettleman mentioned, “Western intelligen­ce agents say that China lost more than a dozen soldiers in the fight”. So far, I have not read in any article by Ajai Shukla mentioning the number of Chinese casualties in Galwan during June 15/16, though he often refers to his reliable sources while he pointedly writes about the Chinese gains. As a defence journalist and the retired colonel, Shukla is expected to comment on the Chinese casualties, especially when NYT has published the details.

Rakesh Srivastava Lakhimpur Kheri

The author responds: The first of the two articles you cite does not mention the number of Indian casualties, so there is no cause to mention Chinese casualties either. I have not authored the second article you ascribe to me.

On your larger question, I have more than once, including in the NYT article you cite, mentioned that there were an unspecifie­d number of Chinese casualties. I would like to be more specific, but the fact is that New Delhi has announced casualty numbers and Beijing is keeping them secret. I do not have two reliable sources on the Chinese side and, without that, I cannot cite precise numbers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India