Business Standard

Bidvest sues GVK, investors in airports holding firm

- DEV CHATTERJEE

Bidvest of South Africa, a key shareholde­r in Mumbai Internatio­nal Airport Ltd (MIAL), has moved the Delhi High Court against the National Investment and

Infrastruc­ture Fund (NIIF), the Public Sector Pension

Investment Board (P SP

Investment­s) of Canada, and the Abu Dhabi Investment

Authority (ADIA), as well as the GVK group, saying the agreement signed between

GVK and the new investors in October last year would lead to a change in the shareholdi­ng of MIAL, which violates its right of first refusal.

The l awsuit, filed on

Monday, comes at a time when the Union government is seeking foreign direct investment in India, promising ease of doing business to overseas investors.

Bidvest, which is trying to sell its 13.5 per cent stake in

MIAL since January last year, said litigation by the GVK group had delayed its exit.

GVK'S stake sale in the airport holding company to the

NIIF and other investors had led to expensive litigation in

India, increasing its cost, it added. This is the first time the NIIF, a government of

India entity, is being sued by a foreign investor for hampering its investment.

When contacted, an NIIF spokespers­on said: “We do not have any comments as the matter is sub judice”. A

GVK official declined to comment on the issue. However, the official had earlier said:

“They (Bidvest) are trying to scuttle our ROFR (right of first refusal) and i nstead must agree to conclude the transactio­n in line with the shareholde­rs’ agreement.”

An arbitratio­n panel had in January ruled against Bidvest on the airport stake sale, GVK said.

In its petition, Bidvest argued that the new investors were making unjust gains at the cost of MIAL shareholde­rs.

They were also entering into a transactio­n by which they were seeking to appropriat­e unto themselves 79.10 per cent shareholdi­ng of GVK Airport Holdings by purchasing new shares being issued by the GVK group.

As GVK Airport Holdings owns 50.5 per cent in MIAL, any change in the holding company will reduce GVK’S stake and give substantia­l indirect stake to new investors, it said. This will result in the new investors gaining a substantia­l foothold, indirectly, in the affairs of Mumbai airport, it said. Bidvest further argued that MIAL, in turn, owned 74 per cent in the Navi Mumbai airport project, and due to the litigation and lack of funds, the GVK group was unable to start the project, impacting the valuation of MIAL.

City and Industrial Developmen­t Corporatio­n (Cidco), the Maharashtr­a government body and shareholde­r in Navi Mumbai airport, has expressed concerns over the delay in the project and lack of progress in constructi­on.

“In any event, any breach by GVK or other investors which results in breach of the shareholde­r agreement will also pose the danger of terminatio­n of the Navi Mumbai airport concession agreement, and thus substantia­lly eroding the valuation of Bidvest’s shareholdi­ng in MIAL and causing serious harm to us,” the company said.

“It is a matter of fact the new investors (NIIF, PSP, ADIA) in normal circumstan­ces were under no legal obligation to transfer funds into an escrow account towards the proposed acquisitio­n of shares of GVK until the satisfacti­on of closing conditions under the proposed transactio­n. However, they still decided to do so, leading to an inescapabl­e conclusion that their objective while depositing funds into escrow accounts was to enable GVK to prevent Bidvest from disposing of its shares in MIAL and thereby ensuring that they were able to acquire a bigger shareholdi­ng in MIAL by adopting unlawful and unfair means as also to induce GVK to enter into the transactio­n in breach of its contractua­l rights,” Bidvest said.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India