Business Standard

Firms can pass on pollution control cost to state discoms

- JYOTI MUKUL

Setting the stage for meeting costs for pollution mitigation by passing it on to tariff, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricit­y (APTEL) has asked the Punjab government to treat investment made by Vedanta promoted-talwandi Sabo Power and Larsen & Toubro’s Nabha Power as “change in law relief.”

This will allow the companies to recover costs for setting up flue-gas desulfuriz­ation (FGD) – mandated under the ministry of environmen­t norms – from the tariff to be paid by the stateowned power distributo­r.

APTEL simultaneo­usly rejected an appeal filed by the Maharashtr­a State Electricit­y Distributi­on Company against state regulator’s order allowing Adani Power’s 3300 Tiroda plant to load the increased cost on to tariffs. Vedanta’s Sterlite Power had signed a share-purchase agreement for taking over the Punjab government’s special purpose vehicle on September 1, 2008.

On the same day, a power purchase agreement (PPA) was executed between TSPL and erstwhile Punjab State Electricit­y Board for sale of power from its 1,980 (3x660) Mw plant.

The company contended that almost seven years after that the Environmen­t (Protection) Rules, 1986 were amended by the MOEF on December 7, 2015 introducin­g the standards of emission and the level of water consumptio­n for all coal based thermal power plants in India.

L&T, on its part, argued that the cutoff date for specificat­ions of the 1,400 Mw Nabha power project was October 10, 2009. The share purchase agreement and PPA with the Punjab government was executed on January 18, 2010.

“This judgment seeks to resolve the challenge of addressing how to implement sustainabl­e developmen­t in brownfield thermal plants, treating the 2015 notificati­on as a change in law event. It gives a path to effectivel­y implement the Central Pollution Control Board’s phased timelines for revised emission norms across 189 thermal power plants, aggregatin­g 167 Gw of installed capacity,” said Amit Kapur, joint managing partner, J Sagar Associates.

Kapur cited the Central Electricit­y Authority’s estimates that the equipment cost would be around ~45-50 lakh per Mw, besides other costs including taxes.

“This would translate into over ~1 trillion in capital expenditur­e,” he added.

 ??  ?? Power tribunal’s order comes as a breather for Vedanta and L&T
Power tribunal’s order comes as a breather for Vedanta and L&T

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India