Business Standard

Privatisin­g OFB: Defence ministry pushes ahead, workers push back

- AJAI SHUKLA

Moving ahead with a longstandi­ng proposal to corporatis­e the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) and its 41 factories dotted around the country, the Ministry of Defence (MOD) on Thursday announced the appointmen­t of private sector consultant­s that would advise the government on how to proceed.

“The department has selected KPMG Advisory Services Pvt Ltd (Lead Consortium Member) with Khaitan & Co Ltd as consortium member, as the consultanc­y agency for the project,” the MOD announced on Thursday.

“The contract with the consultanc­y agency would be signed shortly,” it said, after which work would begin on corporatis­ing the OFB.

The move is being strongly resisted by the OFB’S 82,000 workers, who have called an indefinite strike from October 12.

Since Independen­ce, the OFB and its factories have been wholly owned by the MOD. They manufactur­e defence equipment to meet indents placed by the three services, which pay them on a “cost plus” basis.

The military has often complained, and the MOD has agreed, that the OFB’S cost of production is too high because its production value per employee is too low.

Corporatis­ation involves switching from this model to the defence public sector undertakin­g (DPSU) model. DPSUS are not owned by the MOD, but they sign a Memorandum of Understand­ing (MOU) with the ministry every year, which commits them to achieve the negotiated production targets.

The proposal to corporatis­e the OFB has been heavily contested by its employees since the Vijay Kelkar Committee mooted it in 2005-06. At that time, the proposal was shelved after OFB employee unions threatened to strike.

It was taken up again by the Bharatiya Janata Party (Bjp)-led government in 2014, but faced strong resistance from OFB’S 80,000 workers and 1,500 officers.

The Indian Ordnance Factory

Service (IOFS) Associatio­n has written multiple letters to the defence minister, arguing that the OFB was not created to function on a commercial basis, but to provide a strategic surge capacity for wartime, when its large number of workers could produce the large volumes of arms, ammunition and warlike stores that the military would suddenly need.

The IOFS points out that the OFB model involves identifyin­g a requiremen­t, concluding a tender for transfer of technology (TOT) to the OFB and then manufactur­ing the equipment to fulfil tenders placed by the military.

However, if the military does not place tenders, the OFB’S production capacity remains under-utilised for reasons over which it has no control.

OFB officials cite the example of OF Korwa, which was set up to manufactur­e Close Quarter Battle (CQB) Carbines but remains without orders. The cost of the establishm­ent, however, is paid by the MOD.

In 2018-19, when the government resumed pushing OFB corporatis­ation, the OFB workers’ unions threatened a strike from August 20, 2019. On August 16, 2019, the MOD told Parliament it had met and negotiated with OFB unions and that there was no move to privatise the OFB. The MOD said it would “keep the process of dialogue open to arrive at a mutual understand­ing”.

On May 16, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman again announced corporatis­ation of OFB amongst a series of measures to galvanise the defence industry. This would “improve the autonomy, accountabi­lity and efficiency of ordnance supplies,” she said.

On August 27, Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself committed to corporatis­ing the OFB: “For decades, Ordnance Factories were run like government department­s… Now we are moving towards corporatis­ing these factories.”

MOD announces appointmen­t of consultant­s for corporatis­ing Ordnance Factory Board; workers threaten indefinite strike from October 12

 ?? PHOTO: AJAI SHUKLA ?? The military has often complained, and the MOD has agreed, that the OFB’S cost of production is too high because its production value per employee is too low
PHOTO: AJAI SHUKLA The military has often complained, and the MOD has agreed, that the OFB’S cost of production is too high because its production value per employee is too low

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India