Business Standard

HC stops Lodha from holding office in M P Birla group firms

Harsh Vardhan Lodha ceases to hold any position, say Birlas

- ISHITA AYAN DUTT

The Calcutta High Court (HC) on Friday restrained Harsh Vardhan Lodha from holding any office in M P Birla group entities, marking a crucial victory for the Birlas in the 16-year-old battle over Priyamvada Birla’s will.

The order said Harsh Vardhan Lodha was restrained from holding office in any of the entities of the M P Birla group during pendency of the suit (testamenta­ry). The court also directed implementi­ng the decision of the committee of administra­tors.

These directions mean that Harsh Vardhan Lodha immediatel­y ceases to hold all positions in the M P Birla group, including as director in the firms and other positions in the trusts and societies of the M P Birla group, a statement from the Birlas read.

Lodha is chairman of the

M P Birla group companies.

The court has also restrained Lodha from interferin­g with any decision of the APL Committee (committee of administra­tors Pendente Lite of the estate of Priyamvada Birla), which is taken by majority, the Birla statement added.

However, the court has held that since the companies were not parties to the testamenta­ry proceeding­s, directions cannot be passed against them but decisions of the APL Committee shall be implemente­d by Lodhas, who are plaintiffs in the testamenta­ry proceeding­s.

Debanjan Mandal, partner, Fox & Mandal, advocate for Lodha, said, “The verdict by Justice Sahidullah Munshi over reappointm­ent of Harsh Vardhan Lodha as director of Vindhya Telelinks, Birla Cable and Birla Corporatio­n does not appear to be lawful. Our client’s confidence in the system remains completely unshaken and our client will challenge the judgment for immediate and long-term relief.”

Lodhas will move the appeals court. “Lodha’s reappointm­ent as director in the two said companies (Vindhya Telelinks and Birla Cable) was reviewed by two higher courts, including the Supreme Court, and the initial order restrainin­g the companies from publishing the results of polls taken at their AGMS last year was set aside. The orders passed on Friday were not even asked for and will be challenged on this ground,” said Lodha’s advocate.

In addition, the jurisdicti­on of the probate court and the impermissi­bility of such orders affecting shareholde­rs’ decision of reappointm­ent of a director/chairman will be raised before the appeal court, the Lodha side said. The court passed directions against Lodha in terms of Section 247 of the Indian Succession Act.

In a separate statement, a spokespers­on for Birla Corporatio­n, said, the company will examine the judgement and take necessary steps including filing of appeal because the verdict seems to have ignored shareholde­rs’ democracy and their right to elect by majority of their votes a person as a director of a company.

"Shareholde­rs elected Harsh Varshan Lodha as a director of Birla Corporatio­n with an overwhelmi­ng majority of 98 per cent. Mr Lodha being otherwise not disqualifi­edfrom holdingthe­officeofdi­rector, there is no reason why the verdict of shareholde­rs will not be respected," the spokespers­on added.

The APL Committee — which had been appointed by the high court in 2012 to administer and manage the estate of Priyamvada Birla — has been in focus for the past one year for opposing Lodha’s reappointm­ent in M P Birla group companies.

In July 2019, it had directed removal of Lodha by a majority decision from the boards of Vindhya Telelinks and Birla Cables. It had also refused to support the resolution for the payment of profit-based remunerati­on to Lodha.

The Birla statement on Friday said, “His strangleho­ld on the M P Birla group has been brought to an end by the Calcutta High Court.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India