Business Standard

SC: NO COERCIVE ACTION AGAINST FB INDIA HEAD

- PEERZADA ABRAR

The Supreme Court Wednesday directed a Delhi Legislativ­e Assembly panel not to take coercive action against Facebook India VP and MD Ajit Mohan till October 15 in connection with a summons asking him to depose before it with regard to north east

Delhi riots.

The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday directed the Delhi Legislativ­e Assembly panel to not take coercive action against Facebook India and Ajit Mohan, vicepresid­ent and managing director of Facebook India, till October 15, in connection with summons asking him on behalf of Facebook to depose before it with regard to the Delhi riots.

Mohan had challenged the notice from the Delhi Assembly’s ‘Peace and Harmony’ committee in the Supreme Court. Besides Mohan, other petitioner­s include Facebook India Online Services Pvt. Ltd and Menlo Park headquarte­red Facebook, Inc.

The Delhi Assembly’s Peace and Harmony Committee is probing the social media giant’s alleged failure to track down hate speech. It is looking into the complaints related to the complicity of Facebook officials in the Delhi riots that took place in February.

A three-judge Bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Aniruddha Bose, and Krishna Murari issued notices to the secretary of the Legislativ­e Assembly to respond to the plea. They also issued notices to the Ministries of Law and Justice, Home Affairs, Electronic­s and Informatio­n Technology; Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, represente­d by the secretary

general, and Delhi Police, asking them to respond to the petition.

The petition challenged the jurisdicti­on of the panel having no right to take action against Mohan. It also mentions that there is no law that empowers a state legislatur­e to take coercive action against any person unless it obstructs or impedes its legislativ­e functions.

“The SC has granted interim relief to Mohan and Facebook in an urgent petition filed by Facebook on September 22 to enforce their fundamenta­l rights through a writ petition invoking Article 32 of the Constituti­on,” said Sumit Kochar, a corporate commercial lawyer

and transactio­n advisory partner at Dolce Vita Trustees.

“As a relief to Facebook, it has been ordered that no meeting will be convened by the Delhi Legislativ­e Assembly panel calling Mohan or any other representa­tive to appear before the panel in relation to the Delhi riots till the disposal of a petition filed by Facebook against various respondent­s, including but not limited to the Delhi Legislativ­e Assembly panel,” added Kochar.

The order talks about no coercive action against Mohan and Facebook in relation to summons dated September 10 and September 18, as they pleaded that by targeting a platform used for communicat­ion, it creates a chilling effect on lawful speech, in violation of the fundamenta­l right to freedom of speech and expression.

Facebook did not comment about the query on the developmen­t at the SC.

Senior advocate representi­ng Mohan mentioned that the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constituti­on includes the right to not speak. It was mentioned that he can’t be forced to appear before the panel with a threat of penalty. It was also mentioned that Facebook facing the issue has political overtones. The counsel further submitted that the public order and police are subjects that stand excluded from the power and authority of the Delhi Legislativ­e Assembly.

The legal counsel representi­ng Facebook submitted that it is not a breach of privilege if Mohan does not go before the committee. He also referred to the press conference in which the committee alleged that Facebook was responsibl­e for playing a role in the Delhi riots.

The legal counsel representi­ng the committee argued that Mohan was called only as a witness. He mentioned that there would be no coercive action for non-appearance. The legal counsel mentioned that Facebook is not called as an accused, but to find whether the platform was misused.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India