Cairn CEO to meet finance secy today as FM declines request
Cairn Energy’s CEO Simon Thomson (pictured) will meet Union Finance Secretary Ajay Bhushan Pandey on Thursday as the Uk-based oil company builds pressure on India to honour a $1.2-billion arbitration award that went in its favour. The meeting comes in the backdrop of both sides hardening their stand and the company filing a case in the US and the UK, seeking enforcement of the arbitration award. Thomson had sought an appointment with Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman who decided to ignore the request.
Cairn Energy’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Simon Thomson will meet Union finance secretary Ajay Bhushan Pandey on Thursday as the Uk-based oil company builds pressure on India to honour a $1.2 billion arbitration award that went in its favour.
The meeting comes in the backdrop of both sides hardening stand and the UK energy company filing a case in the US and the UK, seeking enforcement of an arbitration award.
Thomson had sought an appointment with Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman who did not give a formal time. She, however, told Business Standard, “The finance secretary will meet the Cairn CEO tomorrow. Let us wait and see what Cairn has to say in the meeting. We will chart our future strategy based on that.” Cairn is likely to file a case in Canada also. It had already got an order from a Dutch court for enforcement of the December 21 award.
A high level inter-ministerial group (IMG), meanwhile, met in New Delhi on Wednesday to chalk out procedural details of the government’s appeal against the award. It was part of a series of meetings to chart out India’s strategy to contest the award given by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague in December. The IMG comprises senior officials from the department of revenue, ministry of law, department of economic affairs and ministry of external affairs.
India is likely to file an appeal at The Hague by around March 10 and is in talks with senior Dutch lawyers. New Delhi has time till March 21 to file an appeal in accordance with a 90-day window.
The award will likely be contested on two key grounds – jurisdiction and international public policy. Thomson had, however, in a video message last week, expressed willingness to meet Sitharaman.
Cairn Energy has filed a case in a US district court to implement the arbitration award. Earlier, the Edinburgh-based company had filed a similar case in a Dutch court.
In the appeal, India is expected to take a stand that the government has the sovereign right of taxation and private individuals cannot decide on that.
According to the Centre, the award falls outside the domain of a bilateral investment treaty and beyond the jurisdiction of international arbitration.
Also, the government is likely to invoke international public policy, arguing that Cairn did not pay tax in any jurisdiction across the globe.
The government had lost an international arbitration case to energy giant Cairn Plc under the retrospective tax legislation amendment in a verdict on December 21.
Thomson had, in a video address, said last week, “The arbitration is now finalised and the award has been given and we would request, along with others, that the Indian government moves swiftly to adhere to the award that has been given.”
The company had, in a letter to the Centre last month, threatened seizure of Indian government’s assets if New Delhi failed to pay the award. Cairn had got an order from a Dutch lower court on implementation of the award, which will enable the UK firm to identify commercial Indian assets that can be seized, such as aircraft and ships, among others. The case pertains to the ~24,500-crore tax demand on capital gains made by the oil major in reorganising its India business in 2006-07.
The ~8,800-crore arbitration award includes legal fees paid by Cairn for the case. It also includes reversing the dividend as well as tax refund the government had seized and shares the I-T department sold to recover part of the demand.
India had argued, during the Cairn arbitration, that non-compliance to tax was not covered under international treaties. Also, the amendment in the Finance Act, 2012 (retrospective amendment), was only clarificatory in nature. The verdict was given by a three-member panel chaired by Laurent Levy. The final hearing in the case was held in Paris in December 2018. Meanwhile, in 2017, the Iincome Tax Appellate Tribunal had upheld the I-T department’s capital gains tax demand of ~10,240 crore. The matter – pertaining to computation of capital gains and abuse of tax – is being heard by the Delhi High Court, with the next hearing on March 10.
The principal tax demand in case of Cairn stands at ~10,247 crore, besides a penalty at 100 per cent on the tax. There is also interest at 12 per cent per year from February 2017, taking the total to ~24,500 crore.
India had, in December, appealed against Vodafone’s verdict of over ~22,100-crore tax demand at the Singapore court of appeals on grounds of sovereignty.
India had lost the arbitration to the British telecom major over a 2012 legislation that gave the government powers to retrospectively tax deals like Vodafone’s acquisition of 67 per cent stake in Hutchison Whampoa in 2007.