Business Standard

Govt ignored warnings on new variant: Scientists

Claim caution about variant conveyed to PM office, but no major action taken

- DEVJYOT GHOSHAL & KRISHNA DAS 2 May

A forum of scientific advisers set up by the government warned Indian officials in early March of a new and more contagious variant of the coronaviru­s taking hold in the country, five scientists who are part of the forum told Reuters.

Despite the warning, four of the scientists said the government did not seek to impose major restrictio­ns to stop the spread of the virus. Millions of largely unmasked people attended religious festivals and political rallies that were held by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, leaders of the Bharatiya Janata Party and opposition politician­s. Tens of thousands of farmers, meanwhile, continued to camp on the edge of New Delhi protesting the agricultur­al policy changes.

The world’s second-most populous country is struggling to contain a second wave of infections much more severe than its first last year, which some scientists say is being accelerate­d by the new variant and another variant first detected in Britain.

The warning about the new variant in early March was issued by the Indian SARS-COV-2 Genetics Consortium, or INSACOG. It was conveyed to a top official who reports directly to the prime minister, according to one of the scientists, the director of a research centre in northern India who spoke on condition of anonymity. Reuters could not determine whether the INSACOG findings were passed on to Modi himself. PM’S office did not respond to a request for comment.

INSACOG was set up as a forum of scientific advisers by the government in late December specifical­ly to detect genomic variants of the coronaviru­s that might threaten public health. INSACOG researcher­s first detected B.1.617, which is now known as the Indian variant of the virus, as early as February, Ajay Parida, director of the state-run Institute of Life Sciences and a member of INSACOG, told Reuters.

INSACOG shared its findings with the health ministry’s National Centre for Disease Control before March 10, warning that infections could quickly increase in parts of the country, the director of the research centre told Reuters. The findings were then passed on to the health ministry, this person said. The ministry did not respond to requests for comment.

Around that date, INSACOG began to prepare a draft media statement for the ministry. A version of that draft, seen by Reuters, set out the forum’s findings: the new Indian variant had two significan­t mutations to the portion of the virus that attaches to human cells, and it had been traced in 15 per cent to 20 per

cent of samples from Maharashtr­a.

The draft statement said the mutations, called E484Q and L452R, were of “high concern.” It said “there is data of E484Q mutant viruses escaping highly neutralisi­ng antibodies in cultures, and there is data that L452R mutation was responsibl­e for both increased transmissi­bility and immune escape”. Essentiall­y, this meant that mutated versions could more easily enter a human cell and counter a person’s immune response to it.

The ministry made the findings public about two weeks later, on March 24, when it issued a statement that did not include the words “high concern”. The statement said only that more problemati­c variants required following measures already underway - increased testing and quarantine. Testing has since nearly doubled to 1.9 million tests a day.

Asked why the government did not respond more forcefully to the findings, for example by restrictin­g large gatherings, Shahid Jameel, chair of the scientific advisory group of INSACOG, said he was concerned that authoritie­s were not paying enough attention to the evidence as they set policy.

“Policy has to be based on evidence and not the other way around,” he told Reuters. “I am worried that science was not taken into account to drive policy.”

The northern India research centre director said the draft media release was sent to the Cabinet Secretary, Rajiv Gauba, who reports directly to the PM. Reuters was unable to learn whether Modi or his office were informed of the findings. Gauba did not respond to a request for comment.

The government took no steps to prevent gatherings that might hasten the spread of the new variant, as new infections quadrupled by April 1 from a month earlier.

Some scientists say the surge was much larger than expected and the setback cannot be pinned on political leadership alone. “There is no point blaming the government,” Saumitra Das, director of the National Institute of Biomedical Genomics, which is part of INSACOG, told Reuters.

INSACOG reports to the National Centre for Disease Control in New Delhi. NCDC director Sujeet Kumar Singh recently told a private online gathering that strict lockdown measures had been needed in early April, according to a recording of the meeting reviewed by Reuters.

“The exact time, as per our thinking, was 15 days befor,” Singh said in the April 19 meeting, referring to the need for stricter lockdown measures. Singh did not say during the meeting whether he warned the government directly of the need for action at that time. Singh declined to comment to Reuters.

Singh told the April 19 gathering that more recently, he had relayed the urgency of the matter to government officials.

“It was highlighte­d very, very clearly that unless drastic measures are taken now, it will be too late to prevent the mortality which we are going to see,” said Singh, referring to a meeting which took place on April 18. He did not identify which officials were in the meeting or describe their seniority.

Singh said some government officials in the meeting worried that mid-sized towns could see law and order problems as essential medical supplies like oxygen ran out, a scenario that has already begun to play out in parts of India.

The need for urgent action was also expressed the week before by the National Task Force for Covid19, a group of 21 experts and government officials set up last April to provide scientific and technical guidance to the health ministry on the pandemic. It is chaired by V.K. Paul, Modi’s top Covid adviser. The group had a discussion on April 15 and “unanimousl­y agreed that the situation is serious and that we should not hesitate in imposing lockdowns,” said one scientist.

Paul was present at the discussion, according to the scientist. Reuters could not determine if Paul relayed the group’s conclusion to Modi. Paul did not respond to a request for comment from Reuters.

Two days after Singh’s April 18 warning to government officials, Modi addressed the nation on April 20, arguing against lockdowns. He said a lockdown should be the last resort in fighting the virus.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India