Business Standard

Mcleod Russel promoter moves NCLAT against insolvency order

- ISHITA AYAN DUTT

Aditya Khaitan, a promoter of Mcleod Russel India, the country’s largest bulk tea producer, has filed an appeal in the appellate tribunal against a National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) order initiating insolvency proceeding­s in the company.

On August 6, the New Delhi Bench of the NCLT passed an order admitting an applicatio­n by Techno Electric & Engineerin­g, a power infrastruc­ture company, for initiating a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) against Mcleod Russel.

This came after Mcleod defaulted on a ~100-crore loan at 14 per cent interest.

Khaitan has moved the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) as a member of the suspended board of directors of Mcleod Russel. The appeal has been listed for hearing on August 25. Khaitan declined to comment.

In the NCLT, Mcleod had argued that the balance sheet of Techno for the financial year 2018-2019 shows that there was a loan of ~100 crore, which was not reflected thereafter. This means a refund was done of ~100 crore or the debt has been assigned to someone else.

Techno had filed the applicatio­n under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The clause allows a financial creditor to file an applicatio­n for initiating corporate insolvency resolution against a corporate debtor before the adjudicati­ng authority when a default has occurred.

The NCLT order mentioned that an applicatio­n under Section 7 of the code was acceptable so long as the debt is proved to be due and there has been an occurrence of default.

The tribunal said it was satisfied that the applicatio­n was complete and the applicant (Techno) was entitled to claim outstandin­g financial debts from the respondent (Mcleod).

Also, it said there has been default in payment of the financial debt.

The defaulted amount is more than ~1 crore, which is the minimum threshold limit fixed by the code, it noted.

“The adjudicati­ng authority is inclined to admit this petition and initiate CIRP against the respondent. Accordingl­y, the petition is admitted,” said the order.

The trigger for the applicatio­n by Techno was a loan agreement with Mcleod that goes back to 2018. Techno was to provide an inter-corporate deposit (ICD) of ~100 crore to Mcleod subject to the condition that this amount would be utilised for the purpose of repayment of all loans relating to four tea estates due to banks and financial institutio­ns. Mcleod had mortgaged a property.

However, the title deeds relating to the estates were not handed over to Techno and the loan amount was not repaid by the due date of March 31, 2019.

According to the NCLT order, Kanchan Dutta has been appointed interim resolution profession­al (IRP). He has taken control of the operations and management of the company.

According to the IBC timeline, the committee of creditors will have to be formed in 30 days.

Mcleod’s total debt in FY21 stood at ~1,835.40 crore. The company was in the process of working out a debt resolution plan with lenders. Some of them had signed inter-creditor agreement (ICA) before the insolvency applicatio­n filed by Techno was admitted in NCLT.

ON AUGUST 6, THE NEW DELHI BENCH OF NCLT PASSED AN ORDER ADMITTING A PLEA BY TECHNO ELECTRIC & ENGINEERIN­G FOR STARTING A CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION AGAINST MCLEOD RUSSEL, WHICH DEFAULTED ON A ~100-CRORE LOAN AT 14 PER CENT INTEREST

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India