Business Standard

Little in common between US exit of Vietnam & Afghanista­n

War over, Vietnam was eager to embrace America against China threat

- NAYAN CHANDA Former editor of the Far Eastern Economic Review, Nayan Chanda is currently Associate Professor of Internatio­nal Relations, Ashoka University

With Kabul’s airport engulfed in chaos, violence, and bloodshed as thousands of terrified Afghans seek to flee their country, some have likened the unfolding disaster to the April 1975 fall of Saigon. The images of heartrendi­ng desperatio­n for the many rushing the gates of Kabul airport like thousands of Vietnamese once jammed the entrance at Tan Son Nhut airport reinforce the sense of historical déjà vu. But such parallels are a lazy shorthand premised on an optical illusion.

Having witnessed North Vietnamese tanks crashing through the gates of the presidenti­al palace in Saigon and since following Vietnam’s developmen­t into a de facto US ally, I see little in common between the United States’ two ignoble departures. The fallacy of any parallel should have been put to bed with the sight just this past week of an American vice president visiting Hanoi to call for “strategic” ties with the very regime that drove US troops out 46 years ago. This is not to deny the heartbreak­ing similariti­es in suffering endured by the Afghan and Vietnamese people nor the disastrous blows to Washington’s global standing. But in the broader geopolitic­al perspectiv­e, the bearded and black-clad religious fundamenta­lists in Kabul have nothing in common with the greenunifo­rmed Vietnamese communists I spoke to in 1975.

The day after US Army helicopter­s ferried the final remaining American personnel out of Vietnam, communist forces controlled Saigon but opted not to hoist their red and gold flag upon the US Embassy flagpole as they had done at other foreign missions. When I asked a communist official why, he explained that Americans would come back soon once they realised that Vietnam was “the cork in the bottle of Chinese expansioni­sm in Asia”. Stunning though the explanatio­n was, it was clearly not merely whimsical. For the Vietnamese, American war was a thing of the past; threat from the ancient enemy China was the new reality. Several months later, interviewi­ng Hoang Tung, the editor of the Communist Party daily, I found a surprising aversion to bruising the US ego. When I requested access to abandoned US classified files in Saigon, I was bluntly told no because “the war is over” and “there is no need to pour salt into the American wounds”. By way of explanatio­n, he recalled that the day after the Communists’ victory over France in Dien Bien Phu in 1954, Vietnam’s founding father Ho Chi Minh had cautioned him to not gloat about the French defeat. “We will need the French help to rebuild the country,” Ho had told him. The parallel with the recently defeated America was just as obvious in 1975.

With the Taliban demanding the US complete its withdrawal by August 31 and the Biden administra­tion desperatel­y working to extract its citizens and Afghan allies, the contrast between the two victors could not be starker. While Washington is ready, even eager, to turn the page on Afghanista­n and focus on China as a challenger over the horizon, the Taliban seem to have followed Islamabad’s approach and embraced China as their new patron. Although Beijing remains concerned about the ISIS and al-qaeda presence in Afghanista­n amid worries Uighur militants might find safe haven, it is surely eager to fill the vacuum left by the US withdrawal. The violence inflicted by suspected ISIS militants near Kabul airport has created the need for tactical cooperatio­n between the US and Taliban on a narrow basis even as the new regime in Kabul cosies up to America’s longterm geopolitic­al rival in China. Strategic interests often make strange bedfellows. Similar to the surprise visit to Kabul by CIA Director Bill Burns (whose organisati­on was previously responsibl­e for the imprisonme­nt of the Taliban’s current leader), there will sure be other twists in the future — as there have been in the past.

Despite Vietnam’s eagerness to embrace the defeated America to balance

against its historic enemy China and to rebuild the country, restoring ties had to wait decades. Seduced by Deng Xiaoping’s reforming China to partner against the Soviet Union, a bitter America neglected Vietnam’s overtures. However, over the last 20 or so years, Washington has slowly rebuilt its relationsh­ip, gaining new respect for Vietnam as a partner to balance China’s influence.

But as China has grown increasing­ly assertive and has challenged the US on a variety of fronts, the US has emerged more eager to embrace Vietnam as a strategic ally and Vietnam more reluctant in order not to provoke China.

“We need to find ways to pressure and raise the pressure, frankly, on Beijing to abide by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and to challenge its bullying and excessive maritime claims,” Vice President Kamala Harris said in Hanoi. She even called for elevating the relationsh­ip with Vietnam from a comprehens­ive to a strategic partnershi­p. A far cry from America’s calamitous departure from Saigon.

 ?? PHOTOS COURTESY: NAYAN CHANDA ?? Vietnamese civilians fleeing from Danang, fallen to the North Vietnamese Communist army, arrive at Vung Tau port near Saigon in April 1975
PHOTOS COURTESY: NAYAN CHANDA Vietnamese civilians fleeing from Danang, fallen to the North Vietnamese Communist army, arrive at Vung Tau port near Saigon in April 1975
 ??  ?? North Vietnamese tank crashes through the cast-iron gate of the presidenti­al palace in Saigon on April 30, 1975
North Vietnamese tank crashes through the cast-iron gate of the presidenti­al palace in Saigon on April 30, 1975

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India