Business Standard

How safe are India’s dams?

- INFRATALK VINAYAK CHATTERJEE The writer is an infrastruc­ture sector expert. He is also chairman of CII’S National Council on Infrastruc­ture. The views expressed are personal

On August 11, 1979, after a week of extraordin­ary monsoon rains in Gujarat, the two mile-long Machhu DAM-II disintegra­ted. The waters released from the dam’s massive reservoir rushed through the heavily populated downstream area, devastatin­g the industrial city of Morbi and its surroundin­g agricultur­al villages. Bridges gave way, factories crumbled, and thousands of houses collapsed. While no firm figure has ever been establishe­d on the disaster’s final death count, estimates have run as high as 25,000. Despite the enormous scale of the devastatio­n, few people today remember this terrible event. The book No One Had A Tongue To Speak by Tom Wooten and Utpal Sandesara debunked the official claims that the dam failure was an act of God and pointed to structural and communicat­ion failures that led to and exacerbate­d the disaster.

Other notable dam failures in India include Kaddam (1957), Panshet (1961), Khadakwasl­a (1961) Chikkhole (1962) and Nanak Sarar

(1967). More recently, in early February 2021, an area of Chamoli district in Uttarakhan­d was devastated, and 140 lives lost, when a Himalayan glacier broke off and caused a high velocity surge of water down a river sweeping away one dam in its path and damaging another. Jal Shakti Minister Gajendra Singh recently told the Rajya Sabha that since 1979, there were 42 instances of dam failures, the latest being the Annamayya reservoir in Kadapa district of Andhra Pradesh that led to the death of at least 20 people in November 2021.

India has the third largest number of dams in the world at 5,745, following China with 23,842 and the US with 9,261. The dams are also located across the length and breadth of the country (see table). The point of concern is that 80 per cent of the dams are more than 25 years old, and with the accumulate­d burden of deferred maintenanc­e, many have huge associated risks. Adding to this age-stress is that 293 dams (6 per cent) are more than 100 years old and 973 (18 per cent) are 50-100 years old.

The long-term safety of a dam depends on the extent of degradatio­n of its materials, weakening of the foundation­s and seismologi­cal threats. The physical rehabilita­tion of dams involves two clear streams of activity. The first is “de-siltation” — to restore the original reservoir capacity. The second is “safety” — encompassi­ng, structural safety, hydrologic safety and operationa­l safety.

The issue of dam decommissi­oning also needs to be brought into the action-agenda. Demands for decommissi­oning have already been raised for the Mullaperiy­ar dam in Kerala, Dumbur dam over the Gumti river in Tripura and Jayakwadi dam in Maharashtr­a in different contexts by civil society groups and independen­t experts. The Supreme Court ruled on April 8 that a Supervisor­y Committee for the 126year old Mullaperiy­ar dam shall discharge all the functions and powers of the National Dam Safety Authority until a regular national authority becomes functional under the Dam Safety Act, 2021.

The Dam Safety Organisati­on (DSO) was establishe­d in the Central Water Commission (CWC) in May 1979 to convince the states about dam safety. Issues related to dam safety have often been cited in reports of the Comptrolle­r and Auditor General. The efficacy of the DSO has also been questioned in such reports.

The first major programme initiated was the Dam Safety Assurance and Rehabilita­tion Project implemente­d with support from the World Bank from 1991 to 1999 at a cost of ₹423 crore in four states (Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu). The second programme was the World Bank funded Dam Rehabilita­tion and Improvemen­t Project (DRIP), from April 2012 to March 2021 with a much larger budget outlay of ₹3466 crore. This scheme has rehabilita­ted 223 dams located in seven states — Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhan­d. Based on the success of DRIP, the Ministry of Jal Shakti has initiated DRIP Phase II and Phase III. These new schemes have 19 states, and three central agencies (Bhakra Beas Management Board, CWC and Damodar Valley Corporatio­n) on board. The budget outlay is substantia­l at ₹10,211 crore with rehabilita­tion provision of 736 dams.

The Dam Safety Bill, 2019, was passed by the Lok Sabha on August 2, 2019. This legislatio­n provides for surveillan­ce, inspection, operation and maintenanc­e of specified dams by the establishm­ent of a National Committee on Dam Safety, National Dam Safety Authority, State Committee on Dam Safety, and the State Dam Safety Organizati­on. The Bill was opposed by several states on the grounds that it encroached on the sovereignt­y of states to manage their own dams — what with water, constituti­onally, being a state subject. The Centre’s counterpoi­nt was that inter-state river basins cover 92 per cent of the hinterland related to dams, thereby making the Centre competent to enact such a law. Finally, the Rajya Sabha passed the Bill on December 2, 2021.

This new Act and associated rehabilita­tion programmes thus usher in a new era of profession­al management of India’s dams and related safety issues.

Hopefully, India’s 5,745 dams are now safe.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India