Deccan Chronicle

Centre to SC: Recall Lodha rulings

- NEW DELHI, JAN. 20 DC CORRESPOND­ENT

The Centre on Friday urged the Supreme Court to recall the July 18, 2016 and January 2 order on implementa­tion of the Justice Lodha panel’s recommenda­tions on administra­tive reforms in the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).

Mr. Kapil Sibal, appearing for three State associatio­ns joined the AG said the order of one associatio­n one vote should be recalled as it affected three associatio­ns each in Maharashtr­a and Gujarat.

Meanwhile amicus curiae Gopal Subramania­n and Anil divan submitted in sealed cover a list of nine names, including past cricketers to be in the committee of administra­tors. Mr. Subramania­n said the listed included some who are above the age of 70, contrary to Lodha panel recommenda­tions. Senior counsel Kapil Sibal, appearing for three State Associatio­ns questioned the rationale behind recommendi­ng those who are above the age of 70.

However, the bench observed that nine people were too many to run the Board of Control for Cricket in India. The Bench without revealing the nine names indicated that some of them will have to be removed from the list. The Bench said it will appoint administra­tors for the BCCI on January 24 from list of persons given by amicus curiae and till then the names should not be revealed.

The Bench also questioned the Amicus Curiae Gopal Subramania­m and Anil Divan as to why the list of nine names submitted consisted of people over the age of 70 and stated that ongoing internatio­nal matches should not face any trouble as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) is there to run the BCCI. Mr. Subramania­n said every recommenda­tion comes with reason, which has been submitted in another sealed cover. The Supreme Court had earlier issued guidelines, suggesting that the panel of administra­tors should not be over the age of 70.

The Supreme Court’s earlier order made it clear that the nine-year tenure of an office bearer in the state associatio­n or in the BCCI shall be considered cumulative­ly. Following protests from Mr Sibal and Mr. Rohatgi that this was contrary to Lodha panel recommenda­tions and must be modified, the bench said the nine year tenure will be applicable independen­tly to State associatio­ns and the BCCI.

On January 2, the court had dismantled the existing power structure of the BCCI by removing the board’s president Anurag Thakur and secretary Ajay Shirke for impeding the implementa­tion of the Lodha Committee’s recommenda­tions. The court said the board would be supervised by a committee of administra­tors until new office-bearers were elected once the BCCI implemente­d the recommenda­tions. The court had directed the COA to supervise the administra­tion of the BCCI through its chief executive Rahul Johri.

The Bench said the issues raised by the AG will be dealt with at a later stage, after the court appoints a panel of administra­tors to govern BCCI in the interim and implement Lodha panel recommenda­tions. The case will be heard next on Tuesday.

 ?? — PTI ?? Ajay Shirke (left) and Anurag Thakur (right) were removed as BCCI secretary and president respective­ly by the Supreme Court.
— PTI Ajay Shirke (left) and Anurag Thakur (right) were removed as BCCI secretary and president respective­ly by the Supreme Court.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India