Deccan Chronicle

EX-DU PROF. SAIBABA GETS LIFE

Vijay, 6th accused, gets milder penalty, while others get lifer

- JOSEPH RAO | DC

In a landmark judgement, a local court in Gadchiroli on Tuesday sentenced former Delhi University professor G.N. Saibaba and four others to life imprisonme­nt for links with the Maoists. A sixth accused was sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonme­nt.

In the sedition case slapped against him, Saibaba, who is 90 per cent disabled and bound to a wheelchair, is charged for being a member of a banned antination­al Maoist organisati­ons.

Saibaba was arrested in May 2014 by the Gadchiroli police, which recovered a lot of incriminat­ing data from his hard disk.

In a landmark judgement, a local court in Gadchiroli on Tuesday sentenced former Delhi University professor G.N. Saibaba and four others to life imprisonme­nt for links with the Maoists. A sixth accused was sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonme­nt.

Saibaba was found guilty of offences punishable under Sections 13, 18, 20, 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (Amendment 2008).

Principal Gadchiroli district sessions judge Suryakant Shinde announced the verdict in a packed courtroom. Other accused Hem Mishra, Prashant Rahi, Mahesh Tirke and Pandu Narote were also found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonme­nt.

The sixth accused, Vijay Tirke, who was described as a first-timer, was however given a milder punishment of 10 years RI.

Noted lawyer Prashant Sathinatah­an who was special public prosecutor, expressed satisfacti­on over the verdict.

He told this newspaper from Gadchiroli where he was personally present in the court, that all the accused deserved life sentence. “This is a historic judgement,” Mr Sathianath­an added.

The prosecutio­n had examined 23 witnesses including two then Maharashtr­a home secretarie­s, Amitav Ranjan and K.P. Bakshi, who had accorded sanction to prosecute Saibaba under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (Amendment 2008) Act.

Mr Sathianath­an, who led the prosecutio­n legal team, said they presented glaring evidence and concrete facts before the sessions court. “We had rocksolid evidence against him and his role in anti-national Naxal activities,” he stated.

Commenting on the verdict, Gadchiroli superinten­dent of police Abhinav Deshmukh said it is a “Legal strike on white-collar naxalism”.

Saibaba had applied for bail, but the high court here had rejected his plea on all counts, particular­ly the health ground cited by Saibaba and his supporters citing medical reports, which clearly stated that proper medical aid was extended to him from super specialty hospital doctors when he was lodged in Central Prison in Nagpur.

The High Court earlier had also rejected the argument of Saibaba about there being very weak evidence against him.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India