Deccan Chronicle

Explain illegal constructi­ons, state told

How can authoritie­s express helplessne­ss, wonders bench

- DC CORRESPOND­ENT HYDERABAD, MARCH 21

Wondering at the helplessne­ss of the Hyderabad Metropolit­an Authority in preventing illegal constructi­ons, the Hyderabad High Court on Tuesday directed the TS government, HMDA and the Endowments commission­er to file affidavits explaining the facts and circumstan­ces of alleged illegal constructi­ons by some private parties on government land at Devatalagu­tta at Balapur of the city.

A division bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganatha­n and Justice Shameem Akhter was dealing with a PIL by Devatalagu­tta Pariraksha­na Samiti vice-president N. Ramreddy, challengin­g the inaction of the authoritie­s in preventing private parties from taking up constructi­ons on government land.

P.S.P. Suresh Kumar, counsel for the petitioner, submitted that Pride India Builders Ltd., a real estate firm, took up constructi­on of villas by demolishin­g temples and other structures on 150 acres of government land and also lands belonging to private individual­s.

He told the court that though the petitioner had made several complaints to the authoritie­s concerned, there was no response.

Mr Rama Rao, counsel for the HMDA, while admitting that the allegation­s of the petitioner were true, said that private persons were taking up constructi­on activity with the help of status quo orders of the High Court.

Expressing wonder at the continuati­on of constructi­on activity despite status quo order, the bench pointed out that it would not be proper on the part of the HMDA, which is a government institutio­n, to express helplessne­ss.

The bench questioned HMDA counsel why they have not brought to the notice of the court the constructi­on activity by placing the photograph­s before it.

Counsel urged the court to grant a week to place all the details.

While adjourning the case to next week, the bench directed the authoritie­s concerned to file the affidavits.

TS, AP told to bear medical bills

The Hyderabad High Court on Tuesday directed the government­s of both AP and TS to bear the medical bills of retired members of the AP Administra­tive Tribunal in the ratio of 58:42.

A division bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganatha­n and Justice Shameem Akhter was dealing with a petition by K. Srinivas, an advocate of the city, challengin­g the failure of the two government­s to pay the medical bills of the retired APAT members.

The bench asked the retired members to submit their medical bills to the tribunal chairman and told the government­s to clear the bills within 10 days from the day of receiving them.

B. Mahender Reddy, special counsel for the TS government submitted that the state presently was not under the jurisdicti­on of APAT and if the court orders, it would bear medical bills in the ratio of 41:68.

Reacting to this submission, the bench said that rules specify that the government of the state from where an employee retires will bear medical expenses of that employee. This rule is also applicable to High Court judges, the bench said.

Drivers’ work schedule sought

The Hyderabad High Court on Tuesday directed the government­s of AP and Telangana states to submit a detailed report with respect to the working hours of drivers engaged by private transport undertakin­gs, including Diwakar Travels in terms of AP Motor Transport Workers Rules, 1963, by April 18.

A division bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganatha­n and Justice Shameem Akhter was dealing with a PIL by K.V. Subba Reddy, an advocate of the city seeking to direct the two government­s and the authoritie­s concerned to frame guidelines for effective implementa­tion of the Provisions of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 and AP Motor Transport Workers Rules, 1963.

The petitioner also urged the court to declare as illegal the inability of the respondent­s to perform their statutory duty in preventing the accident on February 28, at Moolapadu village in Penuganchi­prolu mandal of Krishna district.

He prayed the court to direct the official respondent­s to make the competent authority for enforcemen­t of AP Motor Transport Workers Rules, 1963, liable for criminal negligence for the loss of lives in the accident at Moolapadu or their failure to implement the law.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India