Deccan Chronicle

Man gets seven-year jail for eve-teasing

- DC CORRESPOND­ENT NEW DELHI, APRIL 28

The Supreme Court on Friday deprecated the evil menace of eve-teasing and said male chauvinism has no room in this country.

Slapping a seven-year sentence on an accused for eveteasing, a three-judge bench of Justices Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar and M.M. Shanatanag­ouder said, “In a civilised society male chauvinism has no room. The Constituti­on confers affirmativ­e rights on women and the said rights are perceptibl­e from Article 15 (prohibitio­n against discrimina­tion).”

The Supreme Court on Friday strongly deprecated the evil menace of eve teasing and said male chauvinism has no room in this country.

Slapping a seven-year sentence on an accused for the offence of eve teasing, a three judge bench of Justices Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar and M.M. Shanatanag­ouder said, “In a civilised society male chauvinism has no room. The Constituti­on of India confers the affirmativ­e rights on women and the said rights are perceptibl­e from Article 15 (prohibitio­n against discrimina­tion) of the Constituti­on.”

Writing the judgment Justice Misra said, “When the right is conferred under the Constituti­on, it has to be understood that there is no condescens­ion. A man should not put his ego or, for that matter, masculinit­y on a pedestal and abandon the concept of civility.”

The court said, “A woman has her own space as a man has. She enjoys as much equality under Article 14 of the Constituti­on as a man does. The right to live with dignity as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constituti­on cannot be violated by indulging in obnoxious act of eve-teasing. It affects the fundamenta­l concept of gender sensitivit­y and justice and the rights of a woman under Article 14 (equality) of the Constituti­on.”

The apex court wondered why the women in this country cannot be allowed to live in peace and lead a life that is empowered with a dignity and freedom. It has to be kept in mind that she has a right to life and entitled to love according to her choice. She has an individual choice which has been legally recognised. No one can compel a woman to love. She has the absolute right to reject. The present case eminently projects a case of psychologi­cal harassment. We are at pains to state that in a civilized society eve-teasing is causing harassment to women in educationa­l institutio­ns, public places, parks, railways stations and other public places which only go to show that requisite sense of respect for women has not been socially cultivated.

The Bench said egoism must succumb to law. Equality has to be regarded as the ‘summum bonum’ of the constituti­onal principle in this context. The instant case portrays the deplorable depravity of the appellant Pawan Kumar that has led to a heart breaking situation for a young girl who has been compelled to kill herself. It upheld seven years RI imposed on Kumar whose constant eve teasing led to the victim Shalu, committing suicide in Chandigarh.

 ??  ?? When the right is conferred under the Constituti­on, it has to be understood that there is no condescens­ion. A man should not put his ego on a pedestal and abandon civility
When the right is conferred under the Constituti­on, it has to be understood that there is no condescens­ion. A man should not put his ego on a pedestal and abandon civility

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India