Deccan Chronicle

Centre should address data leak issue: SC

The bench noted that a person whose PAN is invalidate­d is bound to suffer immensely in his day to day dealings, a situation that should be avoided till the Constituti­on bench authoritat­ively determines the argument of Article 21

- DC CORRESPOND­ENT NEW DELHI, JUNE 9

The Supreme Court on Friday upheld the validity of the law making Aadhaar mandatory for allotment of PAN card and filing of income-tax returns, but exempted those without it for now, until the larger privacy issue is decided

They also submitted that the Centre cannot “belittle” the apex court’s fivejudge bench order of 2015, holding the UID number as voluntary, and not mandatory.

Attorney general Mukul Rohatgi had contended that Aadhaar was made mandatory for allotment of PAN to weed out fake cards that were being used for terror financing and circulatio­n of black money.

Mr Rohatgi also said that with the implementa­tion of Aadhaar, the government had saved over `50,000 crore on various schemes to benefit the poor as well as pensioners.

The bench noted that a person whose PAN card is invalidate­d is bound to suffer immensely in his day to day dealings, a situation that should be avoided till the Constituti­on bench authoritat­ively determines the argument of Article 21 of the Constituti­on.

In the interregnu­m, it said, Parliament could consider toning down the penalising provision itself.

The main issue, as to whether the Aadhaar card scheme, whereby biometric data of an individual is collected, violates right to privacy and, therefore, is offensive of Article 21 of the Constituti­on is yet to be decided by the Constituti­on bench.

While the bench made it clear that Section 139AA will not have any retrospect­ive effect, it said that the Section is neither discrimina­tory nor does it violate Article 14 (right to equality) or an unreasonab­le restrictio­n on the right to profession and trade under Article 19.

The bench said the government’s objective to introduce Section 139AA is laudable.

The bench, noting that about 11.35 lakh cases of duplicate PANs/fraudulent PANs have been detected, of which around 10.52 lakh pertain to individual assesses, said that Parliament in its wisdom thought that one PAN to one person can only be ensured by adopting Aadhaar for allotment of PAN to individual­s.

Referring to reports of leakage of data, the bench said it is necessary to highlight that a large section of citizens feel concerned about possible data leak, and that this concern needs to be addressed by the government through proper measures.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India