Deccan Chronicle

Eco impact study for Kaleswaram begins

This exercise to continue for the next 5 days

- CH. V.M. KRISHNA RAO | DC HYDERABAD, AUG 22:

Union environmen­tal ministry and Central Pollution Control Board officials started a five-day assessment programme on Tuesday, on the impact of the gigantic Kaleswaram Project on the environmen­t.

The mammoth project will be taken up in 15 districts of the Telangana State. Officials of the ministry and board, NGOs, opposition party representa­tives and members of the public are taking part in this marathon debate and expressing their opinions. The impact on environmen­t is a mandatory assessment that has to be tabled before the Union environmen­tal ministry formally approves the clearance of the project.

On the first day of the five-day-assessment programme, the central team conducted the assessment in four districts — Nizamabad, Karimnagar, Medchal, Malkajagir­i and Bhongir — where arguments in favour and counter arguments against the Kaleswaram project were recorded by the team. This exercise will continue up to August 26, covering the remaining 11 districts.

The state government has submitted a report prepared by Environmen­t Protection Training and Research Institute (EPTRI) which concluded that if the State Government follows the rules, amendments and notificati­ons given by ministry of environmen­t and forestry then the environmen­t will not be affected, with the project being largely beneficial for the surroundin­g areas.

This is being objected by the environmen­tal activists, NGOs and few opposition parties who insist that a total review should be made through the Environmen­tal Impact Assessment. At a meeting held in Bhongir on Tuesday, objections were raised by the farmers belonging to the Baswapur and Gandhamall­a reservoir whose lands are going to be submerged. They demanded better compensati­on that should be preferably according to the 2013 Land Acquisitio­n Act.

However Bhongir MP Dr Bura Narasaiah Gowd said in the meeting that the State Go-vernment has no ob-jection in providing a Rehabilita­tion and Resettleme­nt package as per 2013 Act and Grama Sabhas will be conducted at the time of acquisitio­n of their lands. He also reiterated that the meeting was confined only to study environmen­tal impact and not on issues on land acquisitio­n.

At Nizamabad, tribal farmers objected to the project stating they will lose all their life’s possession­s on account of the project work in their areas.

Dr Donti Narasimha Reddy, a green activist said the whole exercise of EPTRI which had prepared the report, was an eyewash and it was as though they had prepared the whole report sitting in the office instead of assessment at ground level. He said there were no details about the impact the project would make, particular­ly on the lives of people in the 1,527 villages and how they are going to benefit from the project etc. He said EPTRI relied on soil testing done in four villages and extended the same finding to all the villages which is scientific­ally incorrect.

The EPTRI had, in its report, stated ‘the project increases the agricultur­e yield, increases crop intensity and crop area, crop diversific­ation, more commercial fish production and increased employment in related industries, due to the increased crop output. This would create beneficial impact on wildlife, flora and fauna, assurance of food security and poverty eradicatio­n. The flora and fauna study indicates that there are no rare and threatened flora and fauna in the project site, the report stated.

 ??  ?? Kaleswaram project
Kaleswaram project

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India