Deccan Chronicle

A policeman posing as a postman

- A.G. Noorani

very sign in the Modi government’s appointmen­t this week of former Intelligen­ce Bureau chief Dineshwar Sharma as its interlocut­or in Jammu and Kashmir reveals a ruse. Sharma headed the IB when the Valley was in revolt over Burhan Wani’s killing in 2016.

He is the person appointed by the Centre to “initiate and carry forward a dialogue with elected representa­tives, various organisati­ons and concerned individual­s in (J&K)”. Precisely because of this sweeping range of participan­ts, designed obviously to sideline it, the Hurriyat had refused to participat­e in the conference­s in New Delhi.

Sharma will have “sustained interactio­n and dialogue to understand the legitimate aspiration­s of a wide cross-section of society”.

Azadi, or even restoratio­n of autonomy, is ruled out. He will next “communicat­e them to the (J&K) government and the Centre”. The policeman will perform as a postman. Did either of the government­s need him to tell them what the people want?

Recently, at least 10 separatist leaders were arrested on charges of illegal financial transactio­ns. On October 14, BJP’s Jitendra Singh had said “the militants are on the run”. New Delhi imagines that it can now strike a hard bargain before the 2019 polls.

Sharma’s remit is unclear. For a dialogue to be sincere and productive, three essentials must be met — readiness to negotiate and compromise; determinat­ion to succeed; and a realistic appraisal of the situation in which the dialogue is held. The BJP is against restoring autonomy. Its determinat­ion is based on the belief that now it can dictate terms; and its assessment of Kashmiris’ aspiration­s is controlled by those of the RSS. What has it to offer at all?

In 2000, the Vajpayee government rejected as “unacceptab­le” a resolution of the J&K Legislativ­e Assembly, which sought merely a return to the constituti­onal position in 1952 — all in the name of “national integratio­n”. In 2001, the Vajpayee government offered “a political dialogue with all sections of the peace-loving people of (J&K), including those who are outside it”. The Hurriyat was invited, but the basis for a dialogue was omitted. Shortly thereafter, Vaj-payee invited Pakistan Presi-dent Pervez Musharraf for talks. This ended in his reneging on a draft the two had agreed on.

In 2002, Arun Jaitley was asked to hold talks on “devolution of powers”, that is revocable at will. He went nowhere. In 2003, N.N. Vohra was appointed as interlocut­or but couldn’t make progress.

In 2010, a three-member team was appointed as interlocut­ors “to hold a sustained dialogue with all sections of the people” and “suggest a way forward that truly represents the aspiration­s of the people of (J&K), specially (the) youth”. They failed miserably on both counts — in understand­ing the people’s aspiration­s and on forwarding proposals that they could accept. Read carefully. The Sharma remit follows closely on theirs and will fail.

New Delhi must first take a major policy decision on how far it is prepared to go to meet the Kashmiris’ demands, and then select a negotiator with authority who can win popular support for any settlement that may be reached.

What is needed is a political approach by a senior politician. Sharma worked with a former IB head Ajit Doval, now Modi’s right-hand man, and with home minister Rajnath Singh when he was Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister, as head of the state’s intelligen­ce. He will not seek out the Hurriyat, only extend “an open invitation to all... who are willing to engage in a dialogue”; they have to appear before him.

A former spy chief is illequippe­d for the job, which goes beyond merely assessing the situation. On October 24, Sharma said, “I have not received anything in writing from the government.” Don Quixote was more cautious. No self-respecting official should allow himself to be treated thus.

Mehbooba Mufti was ecstatic as she clutched at the reed thrown at her to save her sinking ship. She and her masters in New Delhi will blame the Hurriyat for the predictabl­e failure of Sharma’s wild adventure in Kashmir.

By arrangemen­t with Dawn

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India