SC SLAMS NETAS FOR COMMENTS ON PADMAVATI
Apex court refuses to stay Padmavati’s release in UK
The Supreme Court slammed politicians and those holding power and in responsible public office for making adverse comments or giving threats by pre-judging
Padmavati film even before the Censor Board grants certification for its release.
Meanwhile, the controversial Deepika Padukone, Ranvir Singh and Shahid Kapoor starter period film will not be screened in Bihar.
Chief Minister Nitish Kumar has said that
“Padmavati cannot be released in Bihar till government receives proper clarification from the makers of the film”.
The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a plea seeking a ban on the release of controversial film Padmavati in the UK on December 1 and warned politicians and those holding public offices not to make adverse comments, issue threats or pre-judge the movie before it is cleared by the Censor Board.
A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, said, “When the matter is pending for CBFC’s consideration, how can persons in power or holding responsible public offices comment on whether CBFC should issue a certificate or not? It will prejudice the decision-making of CBFC. Such an act is a clear breach of law…”
Such statements violate the principle of rule of law as the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is yet to certify the film, it said, asking the board to take a decision on the certification of the movie with “utmost objectivity”.
Dismissing a PIL filed by advocate M.L. Sharma as “misconceived”, the bench, also comprising Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud, said that when even courts do not prejudge an issue, surely those in high public offices should refrain from making such comments.
Last week, the bench had dismissed a similar PIL from Mr Sharma against the release of the film in India.
Senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for the movie director and producer, said the film will not be released abroad until it receives a CBFC certificate.
“There is no intention to do so, as of now,” he said, informing the court that it would harm the movie’s business interest if it is screened abroad before release in India.
The bench expressed “shock” at certain objectionable contents of the petition and termed them “unwarranted” and “scurrilous” and ordered their deletion.