Deccan Chronicle

It’s scary: Bolton may now unleash global havoc

- Mahir Ali

It may have been purely coincident­al that Donald Trump picked the week of the 15th anniversar­y of the US-led aggression against Iraq to name one of the most reckless and unrepentan­t advocates of that war as his next national security adviser.

But, even though the unforgivab­ly irresponsi­ble havoc unleashed in West Asia in 2003 has yet to run its course, the return of John Bolton to the portals of power is extremely alarming on other fronts — namely Iran and North Korea.

In both cases, Bolton, one of the most odious elements of the George W. Bush administra­tion — which, lest we forget, had more than its fair share of untethered hawks, from Dick Cheney to Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz — has unequivoca­lly advocated “pre-emptive” bombardmen­t as an alternativ­e to diplomacy.

Colin Powell, Bush’s initial secretary of state, considered Bolton a spy for vice-president Cheney in the state department. And Bush, in picking arguably the most dedicated opponent of the UN in his team as the US ambassador to the UN, was obliged to resort to a recess appointmen­t, because numerous Republican­s in Congress considered Bolton far too right wing to constructi­vely represent his nation at that forum.

Trump toyed with the idea of appointing Bolton as his first secretary of state.

He was dissuaded by the knowledge that today’s Republican-dominated Congress, even more extreme in some ways than in the Bush days, would nonetheles­s be reluctant to endorse an uberhawk disguised as a cuckoo (or is it the other way around?). He was also, many reports suggest, put off by Bolton’s distinctiv­e moustache.

Bolton, as a replacemen­t for Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster (inducted after his predecesso­r, Michael Flynn, another ex-general, had to be sacked when he was caught out lying to the FBI and the vice-president), evidently slots right into the plot.

The President does not appreciate advisers who disagree even marginally with his discombobu­lated worldview.

It remains to be seen who will go next — defence secretary James Mattis, Chief of Staff John Kelly (both of them also ex-generals), or attorney general Jeff Sessions, who earned unrelentin­g presidenti­al ire by recusing himself from the probe into the Trump campaign’s links with Russia.

The biggest danger in the short run, however, is the likelihood that Bolton will bolster the more than a decade-long campaign spearheade­d by Israel and Saudi Arabia to mount a military assault against Iran.

That would lead to an unpreceden­ted disaster for the region and the world at a number of levels, but there’s no guarantee that America’s Nato partners can dissuade it from going down that path. The road to Tehran, that is, rather than Damascus, is paved with the most dire of intentions. And a degree of ignorance that mocks the Bush administra­tion’s catalogue of insanity.

Bolton and Pompeo could also bury any prospect of a negotiatio­ns-based rapprochem­ent with North Korea. In his commentari­es in the Wall Street Journal and on Fox News, the only TV channel that Trump routinely heeds, Bolton has made it abundantly clear that he favours a shock-and-awe approach to Pyongyang regardless of what US allies South Korea and Japan might feel about the possible consequenc­es.

In the case of Palestine, he favours a three-state solution: that is, handing the Gaza Strip to Egypt and the diminishin­g bits of West Bank that Israel does not covet to Jordan. Is it any surprise that Zionists of the Likudite variety adore Bolton’s brand of insanity?

Many of the neoconserv­atives who propped up the Bush presidency look askance at Trump’s shenanigan­s, but Bolton is something of an exception. That does not guarantee he will survive for too long in this revolving-door administra­tion, despite being a symptom of the same disease that the President personifie­s.

One can only hope, though, that America’s medium-term future is not represente­d by the likes of Bolton, Trump, Pompeo and the likes of Betsy DeVos and Ben Carson, but will sooner or later fall into the hands of the children who last Saturday eloquently demonstrat­ed their determinat­ion for a much less violent nation, and, by extension, a more peaceful world. By arrangemen­t with Dawn

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India