Deccan Chronicle

Venkaiah bats for CJI, rejects impeachmen­t

V-P says notice lacks merit; Cong. to move SC

- DC CORRESPOND­ENTS NEW DELHI, APRIL 23

Indian judiciary on Monday entered uncharted territory when Rajya Sabha chairperso­n M. Venkaiah Naidu rejected the impeachmen­t motion against Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra submitted by seven Opposition parties, shortly after which the Congress party decided to move the apex court challengin­g the Vice-President’s order.

The Congress, in fact, will trigger an unpreceden­ted crisis in the judiciary when their petition challengin­g Mr Naidu’s order is admitted. Convention demands that the CJI doesn’t hear the case himself and the next senior most judge — who is in this case is Justice J. Chelameswa­r — gets to hear it.

Justice Chelameswa­r is one of the four judges, who had held a press conference in January on the problems facing the Supreme Court, chief among which was the CJI’s functionin­g as master of the roster.

Rajya Sabha chairperso­n Mr Naidu, who had held extensive consultati­ons with top legal and constituti­onal experts, including former chief justices and judges, before taking the decision, rejected the motion early Monday morning before the Supreme Court opened citing lack of substantia­l merit in it.

In a hard-hitting response, senior lawyer and Congress leader Kapil Sibal, who is one of the chief architects of the motion said: “We will certainly move a petition in the SC.”

In a detailed order, the Vice-President said he had a detailed conversati­on on all the aspects arising from the notice.

“Based on all this, I have come to the conclusion that this motion does not deserve to be admitted...On careful analysis and reflection, I find there is virtually no concrete verifiable imputation. We cannot allow any of our pillars of governance to be weakened by any thought, word or action,” he said, adding, “In the absence of credible and verifiable informatio­n placed before me which gives an indication of ‘misbehavio­r’ or ‘incapacity’, it would be inappropri­ate and irresponsi­ble act to accept statement which have (sic) little imperial basis,” he said.

Mr Naidu further said that he was satisfied that admission of this notice of motion was “neither desirable nor proper”.

Turning to the Rajya Sabha handbook to reject the impeachmen­t motion, he said: “In passing, I am constraine­d to observe that in this matter, the well-establishe­d parliament­ary customs and convention­s as have been delineated in para 2.2 of the Handbook for Members of Rajya Sabha, have been disregarde­d.”

However, the decision to go to court seemed to be the Congress’ alone. Other parties who had signed the motion, including Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party remained largely non-committal.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India