Deccan Chronicle

GHMC flouts rules for residentia­l buildings

- MADDY DEEKSHITH | DC HYDERABAD, MAY 30

Senior GHMC officials are allegedly ignoring violation of building rules even though they are well aware of them.

As per rules, the civic body can accord permission for residentia­l or commercial buildings but not for semi-residentia­l or semi-commercial buildings. If this rule is violated, the Corporatio­n has the authority to either demolish the structure, or seize it and impose heavy fines.

Nothing of that sort has been done so far, which is not only affecting revenue but also poses a grave threat to life as these buildings do not have any fire safety measures.

In clear violation of rules, assistant medical officers of health (AMoH) have been issuing trade licences to shop owners who are running their businesses in residentia­l buildings.

According to highly placed sources, the Corporatio­n cannot allow a business to run in a part of a residentia­l building. In such cases the civic body has to collect an impact fee, but this too is only applicable in the erstwhile MCH areas and not in the 12 peripheral municipali­ties which were merged to form the GHMC.

Even the Comptrolle­r and Auditor General of India in its report tabled on March 28 this year had found fault with building permit fee not being levied. The report said that permission was given to 42,425 buildings during 2012-17. An audit was conducted of 894 of those buildings, and it was found that charges were not collected in cases where residentia­l property was used as godowns, warehouses, factory and workplace.

The penalty would have totalled `5.62 crore). Surprising­ly, the corporatio­n to date has neither collected the impact fee in the MCH area nor sealed the buildings nor cancelled the trade licences of offenders in peripheral areas.

Sources said that there are more than one lakh buildings in the peripheral circles of Kukatpally, Serilingam­pally, Quthbullap­ur, LB Nagar, Maheshwara­m, Malkajgiri, Kapra, Alwal, Rajendrana­gar, Ramachandr­apuram and Patancheru. Owners of several buildings have been allowing restaurant­s to operate on the ground floor, which poses a threat to residents on the upper floors.

A senior GHMC officer admitted that violation of building rules occurs and said that though AMoHs were warned not to issue trade licences in residentia­l buildings, they have been blatantly issuing them.

He said that several AMoHs have been issuing permission to restaurant­s in the name of banks and ATMs. "How many banks will a circle have? Despite warnings they have been issuing the permission­s. Even though the issue has been brought to the notice of the higher authoritie­s, this is seen as a source of income for the corporatio­n but not as a matter of the safety of residents," the officer said.

He said that if such buildings were brought under commercial tax net as they should be, the corporatio­n would add at least `50 crore to its annual revenue.

The fact that the corporatio­n would earn more revenue if it observed its own rules shows that individual officers are benefittin­g by pocketing bribes to allow the illegaliti­es to continue.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India