Deccan Chronicle

Let’s honour Gandhi in our hearts and minds

-

There is enough manmade sorrow in the world today for us to say that if only Gandhi were alive, he would have given us solace. He would have done things very differentl­y from the mores of the present day, he would have found a way through his “visceral” truthfulne­ss, “ahimsa” or unrelentin­g use of non-violence, with “satyagraha” as his chosen instrument.

Mahatma Gandhi would be 150 today. He belonged to everyone. His thoughts and actions stirred the world and do so even now, 71 years after he was assassinat­ed by a fanatic who was a votary of Hindu power and was agitated by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi’s flowing humanity and largeness of spirit that made no distinctio­n between people and communitie­s of different faiths.

Gandhiji’s moral force could stop communal riots, as it did in Calcutta (now Kolkata) and Noakhali around the time of Independen­ce. In our times, it’s not unthinkabl­e that the world’s great refugee crisis, caused by war and famine, may have been stemmed by the Mahatma’s satyagraha. Lord Mountbatte­n called Gandhi “a one man boundary force” as his very presence could lead hate-peddlers and warmongers to unsheathe their swords. Gandhi addressed himself to human suffering. His wariness of the machine-age could have contribute­d to mitigate the environmen­tal disaster the world faces. The Mahatma was a great Hindu and a great nationalis­t who gave heart to colonially-oppressed peoples everywhere, but he wasn’t a Hindu nationalis­t. His Ram gave him solace and lay in his heart and guided his conscience. Gandhi saw no need to visit temples. He was unconnecte­d with institutio­nalised religion, unlike the pygmies of today who strike up postures as heroes of their faith and the slayer of men, women and children of other religious beliefs.

We need Gandhi’s thoughts and his mode of action more than ever today, as hearts are being torn asunder in Kashmir on the vile basis of religion alone, whatever the official catechism about developmen­t and security.

We need him because our leaders with joy and abandon profess religionba­sed citizenshi­p and seem intent on keeping out people of a certain faith from the roll book of India, through the dubious communal project that goes by the name of the National Register of Citizens.

The extreme image-consciousn­ess of our present rulers has converted Gandhi to being a mere tagline in advertisem­ents for policies like “Swachchh Bharat”, to promote which the big daddies of politics turn up and routinely pick up brooms, to be photograph­ed in each other’s company and as an act of obeisance to the wielders of power.

They are unaware that this dead symbolism demeans the class of people who, for their living, actually clean streets and toilets. Gandhi, in a real sense, lived and died to uphold their dignity and labour, and the dignity of the existence of all marginalis­ed people.

Let us today honour Gandhi in our hearts and minds, and cut out the ritualism the state apparatus may mount to seek hypocritic­al endorsemen­t for itself in his name.

Gandhiji’s moral force could stop communal riots, as it did in Calcutta and Noakhali around the time of Independen­ce.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India