Deccan Chronicle

‘MY HUSBAND IS INNOCENT’

Said actress Shilpa Shetty while telling the Mumbai crime branch officials that the content on Hotshots was erotica, and not porn

- S. RAMACHANDR­AN

Shilpa Shetty, wife of businessma­n Raj Kundra who was arrested on charges of being involved in the production and publicatio­n of pornograph­ic material through apps, has denied any role in the business, while simultaneo­usly insisting that it is erotica, not pornograph­y, that is streamed on Hotshots, the app which is now under the scanner.

Shilpa told the police, “The kind of content available on Hotshots is there on many OTT platforms, some of it even bolder, but they do not amount to pornograph­y.” She had further stated that her husband was innocent and had no hand in the content creation, an official stated. Kundra’s lawyer Abad Ponda, too, had claimed that no sexual act was shown in the app, and argued that, “If it’s not actual intercours­e, it’s not classified as porn.” The Crime Branch searched the couple’s Juhu residence on Friday night, and have recorded Shilpa’s statement. Kundra was also taken to the apartment by the police during the search. Electronic gadgets and obscene images and videos were reportedly seized from his residence and office, apart from over `7 crore.

Denying any role in the production of the pornograph­ic material, the couple has named Pradeep Bakshi, Raj’s London-based brother-in-law, as the key figure in the activity through Kenrin, his firm which was distributi­ng the banned content. But police claim Kundra had set up a company named Armsprime Media, which, through Kenrin, bought the Hotshots app to upload pornograph­ic content.

Police are looking at the possibilit­y of the earnings from the pornograph­ic content being used for online betting, and are probing Raj’s links with a South Africa-based firm, and the large money transactio­ns between the two. Meanwhile, Kundra’s police custody has been extended till July 27, and his bail plea was turned down. In seeking extension of his custody, police had told the court that Kundra had plans to sell 119 adult films to a person for a sum of USD 1.2 million, and they wanted

to probe this further.

 ??  ?? RAJ KUNDRA’S LAWYER ABAD PONDA HAD CLAIMED TOO THAT NO SEXUAL ACT WAS SHOWN IN THE VIDEOS UPLOADED BY THE APP, AND ARGUED THAT “IF IT’S NOT ACTUAL INTERCOURS­E, IT’S NOT CLASSIFIED AS PORN.”
RAJ KUNDRA’S LAWYER ABAD PONDA HAD CLAIMED TOO THAT NO SEXUAL ACT WAS SHOWN IN THE VIDEOS UPLOADED BY THE APP, AND ARGUED THAT “IF IT’S NOT ACTUAL INTERCOURS­E, IT’S NOT CLASSIFIED AS PORN.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India