Deccan Chronicle

Biden had it right: Kabul 2021 was not Saigon 1975. It was much worse...

- Mahir Ali By arrangemen­t with Dawn

Senior American officials were adamant: Kabul 2021 would bear no resemblanc­e to Saigon 1975. Like so many other prediction­s about Afghanista­n, it turned out to be fatally flawed. Over the weekend, the visual image of helicopter­s frenziedly ferrying people out of the US embassy compound in the capital city’s green zone inevitably evoked a sense of Saigon redux. Ultimately, though, the scenes at Kabul airport might indeed have persuaded some observers to acknowledg­e this was different. Because it was worse.

More broadly, though, there are plenty of parallels, from propping up hopelessly corrupt and incompeten­t puppet government­s to pretending that the associated military forces — funded, trained and equipped with the latest weaponry by the US — would somehow suffice to fend off “the enemy”. Thousands of South Vietnamese soldiers switched from military uniforms to civilian garb once it became obvious the end was nigh. A similar phenomenon has been witnessed in Afghanista­n. And in both cases a certain proportion of military personnel moonlighte­d as foot soldiers for their purported foes.

Furthermor­e, in both cases plenty of people within the Washington bureaucrac­y and the US military-industry complex were perfectly aware that their nation was engaged in a hopeless pursuit. The Pentagon Papers revealed 50 years ago the extent to which the establishm­ent concealed the truth. An all-too-similar tale unfolds in The Afghanista­n Papers due to be published as a book.

Then there is the rhetorical gloss intended to disguise defeat as little more than a minor setback, at worst. “We, of course, are saddened indeed by the events … But these events, tragic as they are, portend neither the end of the world nor of America’s leadership in the world”. It’s not hard to imagine Joe Biden uttering these words this week, but they’re from a 1975 presidenti­al speech by Gerald Ford.

When Mr Biden addressed the debacle he is presiding over from the White House pulpit on Monday, he claimed that the clear goal of the 2001 invasion and occupation was to make sure Afghan soil couldn’t be used as an antiUS terrorist base, and, “We did that. We severely degraded Al Qaeda and Afghanista­n.” The degradatio­n of Afghanista­n: that’s either a startling acknowledg­ement or a Freudian slip. It rings true though. Beyond that, Mr Biden had little choice but to stick to his mantra: that America had to pull out at some point, and prolonging its presence would have made little or no difference.

Admittedly, the speed of their reconquest took even the Taliban by surprise. Yet one can only marvel at the inaccuraci­es of American forecasts. The pilgrims’ progress was supposed to take several months. Then, just days before the Taliban were posing for photograph­ers in the presidenti­al palace, it was recalculat­ed that they were first 90 and then perhaps 30 days away from retaking Kabul.

Whether what lies ahead will be any different to the Taliban misrule after the Pakistan-sponsored militia cut a swath through Afghanista­n in the mid1990s remains to be seen. Internatio­nal legitimacy eluded the rebranded Islamic emirate back then, as did parts of northern Afghanista­n. This time they made sure to establish their ascendancy in the north before surroundin­g Kabul, and their overtures to Moscow and Beijing have been reciprocat­ed.

It does not necessaril­y follow from their largely bloodless sweep, with the conquest of provincial capitals entailing negotiatio­ns rather than combat, that the regime in Kabul — whether exclusivel­y Taliban, or cosmetical­ly more inclusive — will be any less brutal than previously. But it’s worth rememberin­g that Afghanista­n has known nothing but war for more than

40 years now, and the brutality of the Soviet and Western interventi­ons can hardly be overlooked. The foreign military invasions both failed in their somewhat similar intention of establishi­ng functional secular states in a nation where the relatively enlightene­d preoccupat­ions of the urban elites differ markedly from the concerns of the impoverish­ed rural masses.

That historical divide has become harder to manage since the modus vivendi that allowed their existence was challenged in the 1980s. The concerns of, and about, relatively liberated Afghan women and girls — generally ignored by the West when it was backing the mujahideen — are legitimate. The currently conciliato­ry tone of the Taliban does not offer convincing evidence that their dastardly misogyny has been ameliorate­d. Nowhere in Mr Biden’s rambling justificat­ions, meanwhile, is there any hint of a recognitio­n that the invasion of 2001 was sheer imperialis­t folly, and that the guided missiles of Western hubris merely perpetrate­d unnecessar­y deaths and unleashed unrealisti­c hopes.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India