Deccan Chronicle

Padma Lakshmi slams writer

The celebrity chef and food connoisseu­r lashed out at the American columnist for an Indian food review she called “racist and lazy at best”

-

Gene Weingarten, The Washington Post columnist, who also calls himself “epistemolo­gist, enthusiast of excreta-related humor [sic]” on his Twitter profile has unleashed the wrath of none other than the otherwise soft-spoken gastronomy specialist and celebrity chef Padma Lakshmi.

The matter began with a rather long and in-hindsight an unnecessar­y, apparently humour-ridden article Gene had written on 19 August for his column in TWP. In his article, titled “You can’t make me eat these foods,” Gene had listed out foods he wouldn’t eat, such as hazelnuts, anchovies and — well — Indian food. But what has enraged thousands of netizens around

the world was the reason Gene gave for his dislike: according to him, Indian food was “the only ethnic cuisine in the world insanely based entirely on one spice”. His article went on to say, “If you like Indian curries, yay, you like Indian food! If you think Indian curries taste like something that could knock a vulture off a meat wagon, you do not like Indian food. I don’t get it, as a culinary principle,” he continued. “It is as though the French passed a law requiring every dish to be slathered in smashed, pureed snails. (I’d personally have no problem with that, but you might, and I would sympathize.)”

Among the many, including nonIndians who slammed Gene for his write-up, was The Top Chef hostess Padma Lakshmi, who minced no words in calling out the humour columnist for what she called “racist and at best lazy” review. On her Insta page, she posted with a caption saying, “What in the white nonsenseTM is this?” Then, as caption to her screenshot post, she wrote, “There is truly no need for something like this to be published in 2021 (or ever). It’s racist and lazy at best. My issue is not this person’s performati­ve contrarian­ism (although it is tedious) or that he didn’t enjoy the Indian cuisines he’s tasted. My problem is in this attempt at a comedic piece he’s actually just regurgitat­ing old colonizer tropes, gleefully reducing the culture and country of 1.3 billion people to a (frankly) weak punchlinea­nd that the @washington­post published it [sic].”

Then, as a better-deserving punchline, she closed her scathing caption with, “As one Twitter commenter said: ‘I pride myself on my Pakistani cooking. I also love South Indian, and fusion dishes. That you got paid to write this tripe, and boldly spew your racism is deplorable. May your rice be clumpy, roti dry, your chilies unforgivab­le, your chai cold, and your papadams soft.’ — @footybedsh­eets [sic].”

A by-now wiser Gene was quick to issue an apology even as the TWP issued a correction. “From start to finish plus the illo, the column was about what a whining infantile ignorant d---head I am. I should have named a single Indian dish, not the whole cuisine, & I do see how that broad-brush was insulting. Apologies.(Also, yes, curries are spice blends, not spices.) [sic]”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India